Previous Chapter: 10 Recommendations for Current Action and Future Research
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

References

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. The University of Chicago Press.

Acevedo, N., Nunez-Rivera, S., Casas, Y., Cruz, E., & Rivera, P. (2021). Enacting spiritual activism to develop a sense of belonging: Latina community college students choosing and persisting in STEM. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 14(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2021.1891928

Acevedo-Gil, N., Santos, R. E., Alonso, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Latinas/os in community college developmental education: Increasing moments of academic and interpersonal validation. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715572893

Achieving the Dream. (2024). Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College. https://achievingthedream.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-LMA-Spotlight-accessible.pdf

Addy, T. M., Dube, D., & Mitchell, K. A. (2024). Enhancing inclusive instruction: Student perspectives and practical approaches for advancing equity in higher education. Taylor & Francis.

Addy, T. M., Dube, D., Mitchell, K. A., & SoRelle, M. (2021a). What inclusive instructors do: Principles and practices for excellence in college teaching. Routledge.

Addy, T. M., Reeves, P. M., Dube, D., & Mitchell, K. A. (2021b). What really matters for instructors implementing equitable and inclusive teaching approaches. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.182

Addy, T. M., Younas, H., Cetin, P., Rizk, M., Cham, F., Nwankpa, C., & Borzone, M. (2022). The development of the protocol for advancing inclusive teaching efforts (PAITE). Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(0), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.0.05

Ahmad, Z., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2022). Undergraduate research experience models: A systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 101996.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Aikens, M. L., Robertson, M. M., Sadselia, S., Watkins, K., Evans, M., Runyon, C. R. Eby, L. T., & Dolan, E. L. (2017). Race and gender differences in undergraduate research mentoring structures and research outcomes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(2), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0211

The AIP National Task Force to Elevate African American Representation in Undergraduate Physics & Astronomy. (2020). The time is now: Systemic changes to increase African Americans with bachelor’s degrees in physics and astronomy. American Institute of Physics. https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/aipcorp/files/teamup-full-report.pdf

Aizenman, J., King, C., Kling, T., Ramsey, L., Solomon, J., Waratuke, S., & Womack, C. (2022). Interdisciplinary research and STEM-focused social science curriculum support retention and impact perception of science in cohort of S-STEM scholarship students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 23(1).

Al-Hussami, M., Saleh, M. Y., Hayajneh, F., Abdalkader, R. H., & Mahadeen, A. I. (2011). The effects of undergraduate nursing student-faculty interaction outside the classroom on college grade point average. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(5), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.02.004

Albaili, M. (1998). Goal orientations, cognitive strategies, and academic achievement among United Arab Emirates college students. Educational Psychology, 18(2), 195–203, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144341980180205

Alex, P. (2022). Time to pull the plug on traditional grading? Supporters of mastery-based grading say it could promote equity. Educational Next, 22(4).

Allen, D., Dancy, M., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., & Bottia, M. (2022). Racism, sexism, and disconnection: Contrasting experiences of Black women in STEM before and after transfer from community college. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00334-2

Allen, T. O., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Dedicated to their degrees: Adult transfer students in engineering baccalaureate programs. Community College Review, 44(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552115617018

Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.22118191

Aloi, S. L., Gardner, W. S., & Lusher, A. L. (2003). A framework for assessing general education outcomes within the majors. The Journal of General Education, 52(4), 237–252.

Alonso, J. (2023, November 2). Universities can’t accommodate all the computer science majors. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/academics/2023/11/02/high-demand-comp-sci-degrees-leads-enrollment-caps

Álvarez, L., & Coolsaet, B. (2020). Decolonizing environmental justice studies: A Latin American perspective. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 31(2), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272

American Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2017). The future of undergraduate education, the future of America. Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education. https://www.amacad.org/publication/future-undergraduate-education

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/content_files/VC_report.pdf

American Association of University Professors. (2023, March). Tenure and contingency in US higher education. https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/AAUP%20Data%20Snapshot.pdf

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (2018). IMPACT: Improving mathematical prowess and college teaching. https://amatyc.org/resource/resmgr/impact/chapters/impact-full.pdf

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.

Andarvazh, M. R., Afshar, L., & Yazdani, S. (2017). Hidden curriculum: An analytical definition. Academic Medicine, 16. https://doi.org/10.22037/JME.V16I4.18061

Andrews, M. E., Graham, M., Prince, M., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., & Husman, J. (2020). Student resistance to active learning: Do instructors (mostly) get it wrong? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 142–154.

Andrews, T. C., Speer, N. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2022). Building bridges: A review and synthesis of research on teaching knowledge for undergraduate instruction in science, engineering, and mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00380-w

Anthony-Stevens, V., & Matsaw, S. L., Jr. (2020). The productive uncertainty of Indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 595–613.

Apkarian, N., Henderson, C., Stains, M., Raker, J., Johnson, E., & Dancy, M. (2021). What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors. PLoS One, 16(2), e0247544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247544

Aquino, K. C., & Scott, S. (2022). The disability resource office and COVID-19: Disability and accessibility support during the pandemic within the two-year postsecondary environment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 46(12), 907–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2021.2006825

Araghi, T., Busch, C. A., & Cooper, K. M. (2023). The aspects of active-learning science courses that exacerbate and alleviate depression in undergraduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-10-0199

Archer-Kuhn, B., & MacKinnon, S. (2020). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: A pedagogy of trust. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(9), 1.

Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025

Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 267–270). https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666

Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066

Artze-Vega, I., Darby, F., Dewsbury, B., & Imad, M. (2023). The Norton guide to equity-minded teaching. WW Norton.

Asai, D. J. (2020). Race matters. Cell, 181(4), 754–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.044

Ashcroft, J., Jaramillo, V., Blatti, J., Guan, S. S. A., Bui, A., Villasenor, V., Adamian, A., Chavira, G., Saetermoe, C., Le, E., Horowitz, B., Palacios, B., Williams, P. B., Brockman, E., & Moses, J. (2021). BUILDing equity in STEM: A collaborative undergraduate research program to increase achievement of underserved community college students. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 4(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/4/3/11

Ashford, E. (2019, August 20). CBE takes hold in Texas. Community College Daily. https://www.ccdaily.com/2019/08/cbe-takes-hold-texas/

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Association for Career & Technical Education. (2024, February). What is career and technical education? [Infographic]. https://www.acteonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ACTE_WhatIsCTE_Infographic_Feb2024.pdf

Association of American Universities. (n.d.). Undergraduate STEM education initiative. https://www.aau.edu/education-community-impact/undergraduate-education/undergraduate-stem-education-initiative?id=14357

Atchison, C. L., Marshall, A. M., & Collins, T. D., (2019). A multiple case study of inclusive learning communities enabling active participation in geoscience field courses for students with physical disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 472–486.

Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at Myself in the Future”: How mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–15.

Auerbach, A. J., Higgins, M., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Teacher knowledge for active-learning instruction: Expert—novice comparison reveals differences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0149

Austin, A. E. (1994). Understanding and assessing faculty cultures and climates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1994(84), 47–63.

___. (1996). Institutional and departmental cultures: The relationship between teaching and research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1996(90), 57–66.

___. (2011). [Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education]. Paper commissioned by the Board on Science Education of the National Academies, National Research Council. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072578.pdf

Austin, A. E., Campa, H., III, Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 117, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.346

Austin, A. E., Singer, S. R., Grimm, A., Baker, V. L., & Shanks, L. B. (2024). Organization Change Networks (OCNs): An emerging framework for understanding their development and functioning. Innovative Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09750-4

Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 33–64).

Azevedo, R., Mudrick, N., Taub, M., & Wortha, F. (2017). Coupling between metacognition and emotions during STEM learning with advanced learning technologies: A critical analysis, implications for future research, and design of learning systems. Teachers College Record, 119(13).

Bahr, P. R., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized potential: Community college pathways to STEM baccalaureate degrees. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 430–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313

Bahr, P. R., Jones, E. S., & Skiles, J. (2023a). Investigating the viability of transfer pathways to STEM degrees: Do community colleges prepare students for success in university STEM courses? Community College Review, 51(4), 567–592.

Bahr, P. R., McNaughtan, J., & Jackson, G. R. (2023b). Reducing the loss of community college students who demonstrate potential in STEM. Research in Higher Education, 64(5), 675–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09713-8

Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Murnane, R. J., & Au Yeung, N. (2021). Achievement gaps in the wake of COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 266–275.

Bailey, T., Jaggers, S., & Jenkins, D. (2015a). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Harvard University Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S., & Jenkins, P. D. (2015b, March). What we know about guided pathways. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/What-We-Know-Guided-Pathways.pdf

Baldwin, R. G., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2011). Contingent faculty as teachers: What we know; what we need to know. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1485–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409194

Ballen, C. J., Salehi, S., & Cotner, S. (2017). Exams disadvantage women in introductory biology. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186419

Balta, N., Michinov, N., Balyimez, S., & Ayaz, M. F. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect of peer instruction on learning gain: Identification of informational and cultural moderators. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 66–77.

Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

Bang, M., Medin, D., Washinawatok, K., & Chapman, S. (2010). Innovations in culturally based science education through partnerships and community. In M. S. Kwine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 569–592).

Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322

Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 573–738. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099

Barbera, S. A., Berkshire, S. D., Boronat, C. B., & Kennedy, M. H. (2020). Review of undergraduate student retention and graduation since 2010: Patterns, predictions, and recommendations for 2020. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 22(2), 227–250.

Barker, L., Hovey, C. L., & Thompson, L. D. (2014). Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044267

Barlow, A. E., & Villarejo, M. (2004). Making a difference for minorities: Evaluation of an educational enrichment program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20029

Barnes, M. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). A call to use cultural competence when teaching evolution to religious college students: Introducing religious cultural competence in evolution education (ReCCEE). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), es4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0062

Barr, D. A., Gonzalez, M. E., & Wanat, S. F. (2008). The leaky pipeline: Factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Academic Medicine, 83(5), 503–511.

Barrasso, A. P., & Spilios, K. E. (2021). A scoping review of literature assessing the impact of the learning assistant model. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00267-8

Barron, H. A., Brown, J. C., Cotner, S. (2021). The culturally responsive science teaching practices of undergraduate biology teaching assistants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(9), 1320–1358. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21711

Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404

Basow, S. A., & Martin, L. J. (2012). Bias in student evaluations. In M. E. Kite (Ed.), Effective evaluation of teaching: A guide for faculty and administrators (pp. 40–49). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/evals2012/index.php

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Baugus, K. E. (2019). Food insecurity, inadequate childcare, & transportation disadvantage: Student retention and persistence of community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(8), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1627956

Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244015621777. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

Bayles, T., & Morrell, C. (2018). Creating an equitable learning environment. Chemical Engineering Education, 52(2), 143–151.

Bazett, T., & Clough, C. L. (2021). Course coordination as an avenue to departmental culture change. Primus, 31(3-5), 467–482.

Beardall, T. R. (2022). Settler simultaneity and anti-indigenous racism at land-grant universities. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 8(1), 197–212.

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. McGraw-Hill Education.

Behbahanian, A., Davis, E. L., & Roberts, N. A. (2018, June). Open educational resources in the undergraduate engineering curriculum: A materials science case study. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Behling, K. T., & Tobin, T. J. (2018). Reach everyone, teach everyone: Universal design for learning in higher education. West Virginia University Press.

Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affect girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107

Belanger, A. L., Joshi, M. P., Fuesting, M. A., Weisgram, E. S., Claypool, H. M., & Diekman, A. B. (2020). Putting belonging in context: Communal affordances signal belonging in STEM. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219897181

Belfield, C. R., Jenkins, D., & Fink, J. (2019, July). Early momentum metrics: Leading indicators for community college improvement (CCRC Research Brief). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/early-momentum-metrics-leading-indicators.html

Bell, A. E., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E., & Logel, C. E. (2003). Stereotype threat and women’s performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 307–312.

Bell, P., Van Horne, K., & Cheng, B. H. (2017). Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336021

Benabentos, R., Hazari, Z., Stanford, J. S., Potvin, G., Marsteller, P., Thompson, K. V., Cassone, V. M., Murasko, D., & Kramer, L. (2021). Measuring the implementation of student-centered teaching strategies in lower- and upper-division STEM courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(4), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768005

Benaduce, A. P., & Brinn, L. (2024). Reenvisioning office hours to increase participation and engagement. Journal of College Science Teaching, 53(4), 364–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2024.2363127

Benavot, A. (1983). The rise and decline of vocational education. Sociology of Education, 63–76.

Bennett, J. C., Lattuca, L, Redd, K., & York, T. (2020). Strengthening pathways to faculty careers in STEM: Recommendations for systemic change to support underrepresented groups. Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship of student success. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0032

___. (2018). Reclaiming racial justice in equity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(3–4), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1509623

Bensimon, E. M., & Harris, F. (2023). The mediational means of enacting equity-mindedness among community college practitioners. In E. M. Bensimon & L. Malcom (Eds.), Confronting equity issues on campus (pp. 216–246). Routledge.

Bensimon, E. M., Ward, K., & Sanders, K. (2000). The department chair’s role in developing new faculty into teachers and scholars. Anker Publishing Company, Inc.

Berhane, B., Onuma, F., Buenaflor, S., Fries-Britt, S., & Ogwo, A. (2023). “They helped me to get through”: Investigating institutional sources of support at two-year colleges that facilitate the transfer and persistence of Black engineering students. Community College Review, 51(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521221125901

Berhane, B. T., Secules, S., & Onuma, F. J. (2020). Learning while Black: Identity formation and experience for five Black men who transferred into engineering undergraduate programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020024994

Bernard, S. (2010). To enable learning, put (emotional) safety first. Edutopia. George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://www.edutopia.org/neuroscience-brain-based-learning-emotional-safety

Bernard, R. E., & Cooperdock, E. H. G. (2018). No progress on diversity in 40 years. Nature Geoscience, 11(5), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6

Bernardi, F., Brown, C., Davis, L., Ephraim, M., Moody, R., & Trubko, R. (2024). Cultivating inclusivity in introductory undergraduate STEM course syllabi. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 784. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03276-y

Bernstein, D. J., & Huber, M. T. (2006). What is good teaching. Raising the bar through scholarship assessed [Presentation]. International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Bernstein, J. L., & Ginsberg, S. M. (2009). Toward an integrated model of the scholarship of teaching and learning and faculty development. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 1, 57–72.

Betz, A. R., King, B., Grauer, B., Montelone, B., Wiley, Z., & Thurston, L. (2021). Improving academic self-concept and STEM identity through a research immersion: Pathways to STEM summer program. Frontiers in Education, 6, 674817.

Bickerstaff, S., & Cormier, M. S. (2015). Examining faculty questions to facilitate instructional improvement in higher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.11.004

Bier, N., Moore, S., & Van Velsen, M. (2019). Instrumenting courseware and leveraging data with the Open Learning Initiative (OLI). In Companion Proceedings 9th International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference.

Bier, N., Stamper, J., Moore, S., Siegel, D., & Anbar, A. (2023). OLI Torus: A next-generation, open platform for adaptive courseware development, delivery, and research. In Companion Proceedings of the 13th International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference.

Bifulco, C., & Drue, C. (2023). A collaborative model for faculty development: Helping faculty develop inclusive teaching practices. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 42(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.3168

Binning, K. R., Doucette, D., Conrique, B. G., & Singh, C. (2024). Unlocking the benefits of gender diversity: How an ecological-belonging intervention enhances performance in science classrooms. Psychological Sciences, 35(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231222534

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Binning, K. R., Kaufmann, N., McGreevy, E. M., Fotuhi, O., Chen, S., Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Limeri, L., Betancur, L., & Singh, C. (2020). Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: An ecological-belonging intervention. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620929984

Biswas, S., Benabentos, R., Brewe, E., Potvin, G., Edward, J., Kravec, M., & Kramer, L. (2022). Institutionalizing evidence-based STEM reform through faculty professional development and support structures. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 36.

Bitting, K. S., McCartney, M. J., Denning, K. R., & Roberts, J. A. (2018). Conceptual learning outcomes of virtual experiential learning: Results of Google Earth exploration in introductory geoscience courses. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9577-z

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Black, S., Byars-Winston, A., Cabrera, I., & Pfund, C. (2022). Enhancing research mentors’ cultural awareness in STEM: A mentor training intervention. UI Journal, 13(1), 36522.

Blaney, J. M., Hernandez, T. E., Feldon, D. F., & Wofford, A. M. (2024). Transfer student receptivity in patriarchal STEM contexts: Evidence of gendered transfer student stigma in computer science from a mixed methods study. Community College Review, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231218233

Blankenship, S. S., & Ruona, W. E. (2007, February 28–March 4). Professional learning communities and communities of practice: A comparison of models, literature review [Presentation]. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in The Americas, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Blatt, L., Schunn, C. D., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Rottman, B. M. (2020). Variation in which key motivational and academic resources relate to academic performance disparities across introductory college courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00253-0

Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures?: First U.S. edition of the classic work on lecturing. Jossey-Bass.

Bliss, T. J., Hilton, J., III, Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18, 1.

Blum, S. D. (2020). Just one change (just kidding): Ungrading and its necessary accompaniments. In S. D. Blum & A. Kohn, Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead) (pp. 53–73). West Virginia University Press.

Blum, S. D., & Kohn, A. (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press.

Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717715708

Bohn, S., & McConville, S. (2018). Stackable credentials in career education at California community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. https://www.ppic.org/publication/stackable-credentials-in-career-education-at-california-community-colleges/

Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(4), 296–306.

Bond, C. E., Pugsley, J. H., Kedar, L., Ledingham, S. R., Skupinska, M. Z., Gluzinski, T. K., & Boath, M. L. (2022). Learning outcomes, learning support, and cohort cohesion on a virtual field trip: An analysis of student and staff perceptions. Geoscience Communication, 5(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-307-2022

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Bonner, M. W. (2016). Grading rigor in counselor education: A specifications grading framework. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(4), 21–42.

Booker, K. C., & Campbell-Whatley, G. D. (2018). How faculty create learning environments for diversity and inclusion. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 13, 14–27.

Borda, E., Shumacher, E., Hanley, D., Geary, E., Warren, S., Ispen, C., & Stredicke, L. (2020). Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: Lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0203-2

Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006

Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040

Boss, G. J., Davis, T. J., Porter, C. J., & Moore, C. M. (2019). Second to none: Contingent women of color faculty in the classroom. In R. B. Jeffries (Ed.), Diversity, equity, and inclusivity in contemporary higher education (pp. 211–225). IGI Global.

Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Parler, A. D. (2015). The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM major in college. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700308

Boucher, K., Murphy, M., Bartell, D., Smail, J., Logel, C., & Danek, J. (2021). Centering the student experience: What faculty and institutions can do to advance equity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 53(6), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2021.1987804

Bowen, J. A., & Watson, C. E. (2024). Teaching with AI: A practical guide to a new era of human learning. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bowen, R. S., & Cooper, M. M. (2021). Grading on a curve as a systemic issue of equity in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 185–194.

Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton University Press.

The Boyer 2030 Commission. (2022). The equity/excellence imperative: A 2030 blueprint for undergraduate education at research universities. The Association for Undergraduate Education at Research Universities. https://doi.org/10.37514/CUS-B.2022.1503

Boyer, N. R., Mason, J., Cleary, M. N., & Telkamp, J. A. (2022). An exploration of how competency-based education can support self-directed learners and learning. In P. Hughes & J. Yarbrough (Eds.), Self-directed learning and the academic evolution from pedagogy to andragogy (pp. 193–208). IGI Global.

Boyle, P., & Boice, B. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183225886

Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021). A meta-analysis of university STEM summer bridge program effectiveness. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), Article 21.

Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., Bjorkman, K. S., Schultz, Z. D., & Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature, 523, 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/523282a

Bragg, D. D., & Soler, M. C. (2017). Policy narratives on applied baccalaureate degrees: Implications for student access to and progression through college in the United States. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 69(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1289550

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Brame, C. J., & Biel, R. (2015). Group work: Using cooperative learning groups effectively. Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-facilitating-group-work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/

Branch, M. A. (2015, September/October). Renewed debate over renaming Calhoun. Yale Alumni Magazine. https://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/articles/4153-calhoun-college-renaming

Branchaw, J. L., Butz, A. R., & Smith, A. R. (2020). Evaluation of the second edition of entering research: A customizable curriculum for apprentice-style undergraduate and graduate research training programs and courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-04-0073

Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9

Brathwaite, J. R., Fay, M. P., & Moussa, A. (2021). Improving developmental and college-level mathematics: Prominent reforms and the need to address equity (CCRC Working Papers No. 124). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/improving-developmental-college-level-mathematics.html

Braxton, J. M., Eimers, M. T., & Bayer, A. E. (1996). The implications of teaching norms for the improvement of undergraduate education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(6), 603–625.

Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y

Bressoud, D., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Seven characteristics of successful calculus programs. Notices of the AMS, 62(2), 144–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti1209

Bressoud, D. M. (2014). [Attracting and retaining students to complete two-and four-year undergraduate degrees in STEM: The role of undergraduate mathematics education]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739

___. (2021). The strange role of calculus in the United States. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(3), 521–533.

Brint, S. G., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. Oxford University Press.

Brod, G. (2021). Toward an understanding of when prior knowledge helps or hinders learning. NPJ Science of Learning, 6(1), 24.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). MIT Press.

Brown, A. M., & Nurser, T. A. (2011). Students as change agents-new ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy.

Brown, M., DeMonbrun, R. M., & Teasley, S. (2018). Taken together: Conceptualizing students’ concurrent course enrollment across the post-secondary curriculum using temporal analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.5

Brown, M. (2024). [Toxic combinations, content repetition, and delayed momentum: Conceptualizing the emerging evidence on curricular complexity in 4-year institutions as an influence on equitable and effective teaching in undergraduate STEM education]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Equitable and Effective Teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Framework for Institutions, Educators, and Disciplines. The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Brown, M. G., Lamm, M. H., & Alam, M. I. (2023, June). Board 235: Chemical engineers in chemistry coursework: Longitudinal impacts on engineering identity. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Brownell, S. E., Freeman, S., Wenderoth, M. P., & Crowe, A. J. (2014). BioCore guide: A tool for interpreting the core concepts for vision and change for biology majors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233

Brownlie, N., Burke, K., & van der Laan, L. (2024). Quality indicators of effective teacher-created summative assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 30–45.

Brummer, J., Yee, S., & Wakefield, N. (2024). Collaborating on inquiry-based mathematics education curricula with graduate student instructors to establish an equitable and sustainable community of practice. PRIMUS, 34(7), 714–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2222278

Bryant, N. (2016). The influence of the TRIO student support services program on first-generation students: An exploratory study (Publication No. 10190954) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Boston]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. In Frontiers in sociology of education (pp. 127–162). Springer.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Buchan, T. A., Kruse, S., Todd, J., & Tyson, L. (2020). A transformative approach to incorporating adaptive courseware: Strategic implementation, backward design and research-based teaching practices. Current Issues in Emerging ELearning, 7(1), 3.

Bullock, C. D. (2003). Online collection of midterm student feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 96, 95–102.

Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X., & Guay, F. (2022). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 46–72.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Occupational employment projections data, special tabulations of 2022-32 employment projections. https://www.bls.gov/emp/data/occupational-data.htm

Burke, A., Okrent, A., & Hale, K. (2022). Science and engineering indicators 2022: The state of U.S. science and engineering (NSB-2022-1). National Science Board, National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/u-s-and-global-stem-education-and-labor-force

Burke, M. (2022, April 26). Letter grades on way out? Why some University of California departments may use alternatives. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/letter-grades-on-way-out-why-some-university-of-california-departments-may-use-alternatives/670994

Burmeister, K. C., Atchison, C. L., Egger, A. E., Rademacher, L. K., Ryker, K., & Tikoff, B. (2020). Meeting the challenge; how the geoscience community provided robust online capstone experiences in response to the COVID-19 pandemic [Virtual conference session]. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2020AM-358012

Burmeister, K., Rademacher, L., & Ryker, K. (2020). Learning outcomes. Teach the Earth, Teaching with Online Field Experiences. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/online_field/learning_outcomes.html

Burt, B. A., Stone, B. D., Motshubi, R., & Baber, L. D. (2023). STEM validation among underrepresented students: Leveraging insights from a STEM diversity program to broaden participation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000300

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Busch, C. A., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2023). Women drive efforts to highlight concealable stigmatized identities in US academic science and engineering. PLoS One, 18(7), e0287795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287795

Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2019). Evolving roles of scientists as change agents in science education over a decade: SFES roles beyond disciple-based education research. Science Advances, 5(6), eaav6403. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav6403

Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 119–138.

Byun, S. Y., Meece, J. L., & Irvin, M. J. (2012). Rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary educational attainment revisited. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 412–437.

Cabrera, N. L., Miner, D. D., & Milem, J. F. (2013). Can a summer bridge program impact first-year persistence and performance?: A case study of the new start summer program. Research in Higher Education, 54, 481–498.

Caffarella, R. S., & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022978806131

Cafferty, P. (2021). Point of view: Taking the office hour out of the office. Journal of College Science Teaching, 50(3), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2021.12290501

Cain, J., Medina, M., Romanelli, F., & Persky, A. (2022). Deficiencies of traditional grading systems and recommendations for the future. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(7), 8850. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8850

California State University. (n.d.). Course equity portal. https://www.studentsuccessanalytics.com/courseEquityPortal.html

Campbell, C. M. (2023). Great college teaching: Where it happens and how to foster it everywhere. Harvard Education Press.

Campbell, R., Clark, D., & OShaughnessy, J. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on implementing mastery grading in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. PRIMUS, 30(8–10), 837–848.

Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility value information. Motivation Science, 1(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000015

Canning, E. A., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., Tibbetts, Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2018). Improving performance and retention in introductory biology with a utility-value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000244

Canning, E. A., & Limeri, L. B. (2023). Theoretical and methodological directions in mindset intervention research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(6), e12758. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12758

Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), eaau4734. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

Canning, E. A., Ozier, E., Williams, H. E., AlRasheed, R., & Murphy, M. C. (2022). Professors who signal a fixed mindset about ability undermine women’s performance in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(5), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030398

Canning, E. A., White, M., & Davis, W. B. (2024). Growth mindset messages from instructors improve academic performance among first-generation college students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-07-0131

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Capone, R. (2022). Blended learning and student-centered active learning environment: A case study with STEM undergraduate students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00195-5

Carabajal, I. G., & Atchison, C. L. (2020). An investigation of accessible and inclusive instructional field practices in US geoscience departments. Advances in Geosciences, 53, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-53-2020

Carabajal, I. G., Marshall, A. M., & Atchison, C. L. (2017). A synthesis of instructional strategies in geoscience education literature that address barriers to inclusion for students with disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-211.1

Carlisle, D. L., & Weaver, G. C. (2018). STEM education centers: Catalyzing the improvement of undergraduate STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–21.

Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Carlson, E. R. (2022). Personalized coaching model to address equity gaps in student learning outcomes: A program evaluation [Doctoral dissertation, New Jersey City University].

Carnevale, A. P., Strohl, J., Campbell, K. P., Gulish, A., Cheah, B., Nyhof, E., & Fix, L. (2024). Learning and earning by degrees: Gains in college degree attainment have enriched the nation and every state, but racial and gender inequality persists. Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce. https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CEW-attainment-gains-full_report.pdf

Carroll, J. B., & Wolverton, M. (2004). Who becomes a chair? New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(126), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.144

Carter, L. (2006). Postcolonial interventions within science education: Using postcolonial ideas to reconsider cultural diversity scholarship. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00219.x

Casey, J. R., Supriya, K., Shaked, S., Caram, J. R., Russell, A., & Courey, A. J. (2023). Participation in a high-structure general chemistry course increases student sense of belonging and persistence to organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2860–2872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01253

Casper, A. M., Eddy, S. L., & Freeman, S. (2019). True grit: Passion and persistence make an innovative course design work. PLoS Biology, 17(7), e3000359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000359

CAST. (n. d.). About Universal Design for Learning. https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl

Castillo, W., & Gillborn, D. (2022). How to “QuantCrit”: Practices and questions for education data researchers and users. (EdWorking Paper No. 22-546). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/v5kh-dd65

Castillo-Montoya, M. (2020). The challenges and tensions in equity-minded teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(2), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2020.1732791

Castillo-Montoya, M., Bolitzer, L. A., & Santiago-Sotto, S. (2023). Reimagining faculty development: Activating instructional development for diversity, equity, and inclusion. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 38, pp. 415–481). Springer Cham.

Castillo-Montoya, M., & Ives, J. (2020). A liberating education: Integrating funds of knowledge and disciplinary knowledge to create tools for students’ lives. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(164), 39–48.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Castle, S. D., Byrd, W. C., Koester, B. P., Pearson, M. I., Bonem, E., Caporale, N., Cwik, S., Denaro, K., Fiorini, S., Li, Y., Mead, C., Rypkema, H., Sweeder, R. D., Valdivia Medinaceli, M. B., Whitcomb, K. M., Brownell, S. E., Levesque-Bristol, C., Molinaro, M., Singh, C., McKay, T. A., & Matz, R. L. (2024). Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes in students’ early STEM courses at six research universities. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00474-7

Cavanagh, A. J., Chen, X., Bathgate, M., Frederick, J., Hanauer, D. I., & Graham, M. J. (2018). Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), Article 10.

Cayubit, R. F. O. (2021). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x

CBE—Life Sciences Education. (2024). Special issue—Equity, inclusion, access, and justice in biology education. The American Society for Cell Biology. https://www.lifescied.org/equity-special-issue/

Cech, E. A., Metz, A., Smith, J. L., & deVries, K. (2017). Epistemological dominance and social inequality: Experiences of Native American science, engineering, and health student. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(5), 743–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916687037

Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Activating prior knowledge. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. https://teaching.vt.edu/teachingresources/adjustinginstruction/priorknowledge.html

Center for Higher Education Policy and Practice. (2024a). How learner-centered higher education design and delivery accelerates equitable access and outcomes. https://www.chepp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CHEPP_ONLINE-BY-DESIGN_WHITE-PAPER85.pdf

___. (2024b). Online by design: How accessibility is fundamental to learner-centered design. https://www.chepp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CHEPP_ACCESSIBILITY_WHITE-PAPER_v5.pdf

Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning. (n.d.) About CIRTL. https://cirtl.net/about/

Center for Urban Education, Rossier School of Education. (2015). Five principles for creating equity by design. University of Southern California. https://welcome.solano.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CUE_equity_design_principles.pdf

Cerna, O., Plancarte, V., Raufman, J., & Mahecha-Rodriguez, J. (2023). Lessons from the Dana Center’s Corequisite Research Design Collaborative Study. Research Brief. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness.

Cetina, K. K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.

Chadha, D. (2022). How do we prepare to teach? Exploring science lecturers’ authentic approaches to teaching in higher education. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09972-4

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Chandar, S., Crum, R., Pennino, E., Ishikawa, C., Ghosh Hajra, S., & McDonald, K. (2023). Ten tips for developing a more inviting syllabus. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 24(3), e00032–23.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21146

Chappell, C., Gonczi, A., & Hager, P. (2020). Competency-based education. In G. Foley (Ed.), Understanding adult education and training (pp. 191–205). Routledge.

Chase, M. K. (2020). Student voice in STEM classroom assessment practice: A pilot intervention. Research & Practice in Assessment, 15(2), n2.

Chasteen, S. V., & Code, W. J. (2018). The science education initiative handbook: A practical guide to fostering change in university courses and faculty by embedding discipline-based education specialists within departments. University of Colorado Boulder.

Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Chiarella, D., & Vurro, G. (2020). Fieldwork and disability: An overview for an inclusive experience. Geological Magazine, 157(11), 1933–1938.

Chini, J. (2024). [Describing disability: Language and models]. Commissioned paper prepared for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Committee on Beyond Compliance: Promoting the Success of People with Disabilities in the STEM Workforce.

Choi, Y. H. (2024). Master narratives and resistance narratives: How women of color on community college STEM education pathways push back. Community College Review, 52(3), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521241238746

Christe, B. (2013). The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines: A literature review. Journal of STEM Education, 14(3), 22–26.

Chu, D. (2006). The department chair primer: Leading and managing academic departments (Vol. 64). Jossey-Bass.

Chun, E., & Evans, A. (2023). The challenges of minoritized contingent faculty in higher education. Purdue University Press.

Clark, D., & Talbert, R. (2023). Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practices that promote authentic learning and studied engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis.

Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249.

Clark, N., & Hsu, J. L. (2023). Insight from biology program learning outcomes: Implications for teaching, learning, and assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-09-0177

Clements, T. P., Friedman, K. L., Johnson, H. J., Meier, C. J., Watkins, J., Brockman, A. J., & Brame, C. J. (2022). “It made me feel like a bigger part of the STEM community”: Incorporation of learning assistants enhances students’ sense of belonging in a large introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-09-0287

Clemmons, A. W., Donovan, D. A., Theobald, E. J., & Crowe, A. J. (2022). Using the intended–enacted–experienced curriculum model to map the vision and change core competencies in undergraduate biology programs and courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-02-0054

Clemmons, A. W., Timbrook, J., Herron, J. C., & Crowe, A. J. (2020). BioSkills Guide: Development and national validation of a tool for interpreting the Vision and Change core competencies. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0259

Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307–1310. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128317

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324(5925), 400–403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170769

Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137

Cohen, G. L., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. D. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1302–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258011

Cohen, R., & Kelly, A. M. (2020). Mathematics as a factor in community college STEM performance, persistence, and degree attainment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21594

Cole, D., & Griffin, K. A. (2013). Advancing the study of student-faculty interaction: A focus on diverse students and faculty. In M. B. Paulson (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 561–611). Springer Netherlands.

Coleman, M. S., Smith, T. L., & Miller, E. R. (2019). Catalysts for achieving sustained improvement in the quality of undergraduate STEM education. Dædalus, 148(4), 29–46.

Collins, T. (1997). For openers, an inclusive course syllabus. In W. E. Campbell & K. A. Smith (Eds.), New paradigms for college teaching (pp. 79–102). Interaction Book Company.

CoMInds. (2020). CoMInDs Hub. https://www.comindshub.org/

Community College Research Center. (2022). Community college FAQs. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/community-college-faqs.html

Connell, G. L., Donovan, D. A., & Theobald, E. J. (2023). Forming groups in large-enrollment biology class: Group permanence matters more than group size. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(4), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-08-0172

Connolly, M. R., Savoy, J. N., Lee, Y.-G., & Hill, L. B. (2016). Building a better future STEM faculty: How doctoral teaching programs can improve undergraduate education. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

___. (2018). The effects of doctoral teaching development on early-career STEM scholars’ college teaching self-efficacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0039

Considine, H., Nedic, Z., & Nafalski, A. (2017, June). Assisting students in online experimentation. In 2017 4th Experiment@ International Conference (exp. At’17) (pp. 47–51). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7984371

Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of teaching metacognitive learning strategies on performance in general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 961–967.

Cooke, M., Breitbart, M., Cooperdock, E., Levin, N., Niemi, N., Bell, C., Stevens, L., & Viskupic, K. (2021). First-year graduate courses foster inclusion. Nature Geoscience, 14(8), 539–540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00800-6

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass

Cook-Sather, A., Salmeron, D., & Smith, T. (2023, June). Humanizing STEM education through student-faculty pedagogical partnerships. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1153087. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1153087

Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074

Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Corin, E. N., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2020). The role of dual enrollment STEM coursework in increasing STEM career interest among American high school students. Teachers College Record, 122(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200210

Coryell, J. E. (2016). Creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers: US models of resources and support, lessons learned, and building a culture of teaching and learning excellence. Excellence and Innovation in Learning and Teaching.

Costello, M. A., Nagel, A. G., Hunt, G. L., Rivens, A. J., Hazelwood, O. A., Pettit, C., & Allen, J. P. (2022). Facilitating connection to enhance college student well-being: Evaluation of an experiential group program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 70(3–4), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12601

Cotner, S., & Ballen, C. J. (2017). Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable? PLoS One, 12(12), e0189610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189610

Covarrubias, R., Valle, I., Laiduc, G., & Azmitia, M. (2019). “You never become fully independent”: Family roles and independence in first-generation college students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(4), 381–410.

Cowan, C. C., Brady, M., Arvizu, J., Reece, A., Weinman, B., & Zivot, M. (2022). Cultivating not weeding: STEM first year learning community fosters student persistence and engagement. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 26(2), 500–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251221093749

Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165551505057016

Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129

Cozart, D. L., Horan, E. M., & Frome, G. (2021). Rethinking the traditional textbook: A case for Open Educational Resources (OER) and no-cost learning materials. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(2), n2.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8, 139–167. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50, 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2

Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298246003

Croizet, J. C., & Millet, M. (2012). Social class and test performance: From stereotype threat to symbolic violence and vice versa. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process and application (pp. 188–201). Oxford University Press.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.

Cruz, C. L., Holmberg-Douglas, N., Onuska, N. P. R., McManus, J. B., MacKenzie, I. A., Hutson, B. L., Eskew, N. A., & Nicewicz, D. A. (2020). Development of a large-enrollment course-based research experience in an undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory: Structure–function relationships in pyrylium photoredox catalysts. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1572–1578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00786

Culver, K. C., & Kezar, A. (2020). The impacts of 2020 on advancement of non-tenure track and adjunct faculty. Pullias Center for Higher Education, University of Southern California. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/26405/6_The_Impacts_of_2020_on_Advancement_of_Contingent_Faculty-Culver_Kezar.pdf

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Culver, K. C., Harper, J., & Kezar, A. (2021). Design for equity in higher education. Pullias Center for Higher Education.

Culver, K. C., Kezar, A., & Koren, E. R. (2023). Improving access and inclusion for VITAL faculty in the scholarship of teaching and learning through sustained professional development programs. Innovative Higher Education, 48(6), 1071–1094.

Curley, B., & Downey, J. (2024). Implementation of alternative grading methods in a mathematical statistics course. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 32(3), 272–282.

Cushing, E., English, D., Therriault, S., & Lavinson, R. (2019). Developing a college and career-ready workforce: An analysis of ESSA, Perkins V, IDEA, and WIOA. College and Career Readiness and Success Center, American Institutes for Research.

D’Agostino, S., & Kosegarten, J. (2015). Reevaluating teaching evaluations. Liberal Education, Summer, 58–63.

Dalporto, H., & Tessler, B. (2020, April). Voices from the field: How community colleges are advancing equity in career and technical education. MDRC.

Dancy, M., & Hodari, A. K. (2023). How well-intentioned white male physicists maintain ignorance of inequity and justify inaction. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00433-8

Dancy, M., Rainey, K., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., & Moller, S. (2020). Undergraduates’ awareness of White and male privilege in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3

Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-X

___. (2023). To make science and engineering more diverse, make research socially relevant: Science and engineering disciplines sometimes struggle to connect research with social benefits and to retain diverse students. Solving one problem can solve the other. Issues in Science and Technology, 40(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.58875/MAAC9457

Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning intervention for postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195–220.

Dawson, P., van der Meer, J., Skalicky, J., & Cowley, K. (2014). On the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540007

De Silva, L. M. H., Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Chounta, I. A., & Pishtari, G. (2024). Curriculum analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1–47.

DeChenne, S. E., Koziol, N., Needham, M., & Enochs, L. (2015). Modeling sources of teaching self-efficacy for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduate teaching assistants. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(3), Article 32.

Deil-Amen, R. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: Rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11779085

Deitz, S., & Freyman, C. (2024). The state of U.S. science and engineering 2024 (NSB-2024-3). National Science Board, National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20243

Deitz, S., & Henke, R. (2023). Higher education in science and engineering: Science and engineering indicators 2024 (NSB-2023-32). National Science Board, National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202332/

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Delamont, S. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of qualitative research in education. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dempsey, P., & Huber, T. (2020, May 20). Using standards-based grading to reduce mathematics anxiety: A review of literature (ED605522). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605522.pdf

Denaro, K., Dennin, K., Dennin, M., & Sato, B. (2022). Identifying systemic inequity in higher education and opportunities for improvement. PLoS One, 17(4), e0264059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264059

Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114

Dennin, M., Schultz, Z. D., Feig, A., Finkelstein, N., Greenhoot, A. F., Hildreth, M., Leibovich, A. K., Martin, J. D., Moldwin, M. B., O’Dowd, D. K., Posey, L. A., Smith, T. L., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Aligning practice to policies: Changing the culture to recognize and reward teaching at research universities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032

Departmental Action Team. (n.d.). Departmental Action Team Project. https://dat-project.org

DeSilver, D. (2019). A majority of US colleges admit most students who apply. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/04/09/a-majority-of-u-s-colleges-admit-most-students-who-apply/

Dettori, L., & Settle, A. (2005). Course mentoring: Toward achieving consistency in the curriculum. Information Systems Education Journal, 3.

Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903244398

Dewsbury, B. M. (2020). Deep teaching in a college STEM classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z

Dewsbury, B. M., Swanson, H. J., Moseman-Valtierra, S., & Caulkins, J. (2022). Inclusive and active pedagogies reduce academic outcome gaps and improve long-term performance. PLoS One, 17(6), e0268620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268620

Diamond, M. R. (2004). The usefulness of structured mid-term feedback as a catalyst for change in higher education classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404046845

Diaz Eaton, C., Bonner, K., Cangialosi, K., Dewsbury, B., Diamond-Stanic, M., Douma, J., Smith, M., Taylor, R., Wojdak, J., & Wilfong, K. (2022). Sustainability and justice: Challenges and opportunities for an open STEM education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), es4. https://doi/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0180

DiBenedetto, K., Peters, E. E., & Voight, M. (2021). Ensuring a more equitable future: Colleges as models for equitable employment. Postsecondary Value Commission.

Diegelman-Parente, A. (2011). The use of mastery learning with competency-based grading in an organic chemistry course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(5), 50.

Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342

Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. https://doi.org/10/1037/a0025199

Dika, S. L., & D’Amico, M. M. (2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 368–383. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21301

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Donovan, D. A., Connell, G. A., & Grunspan, D. Z. (2018). Student learning outcomes and attitudes using three methods of group formation in a nonmajors biology class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0283

Dori, Y. J., Mevarech, Z. R., & Baker, D. R. (2018). Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, 24, 386.

Dortch, D., & Patel, C. (2017). Black undergraduate women and their sense of belonging in STEM at predominantly White institutions. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 10(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1331854

Downing, V. R., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-09-0186

Driessen, E. P., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., & Ballen, C. J. (2020). Demystifying the meaning of active learning in postsecondary biology education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4), Article 52.

DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2021). Not “a nation of immigrants”: Settler colonialism, white supremacy, and a history of erasure and exclusion. Beacon Press.

___. (2023). An Indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Beacon Press.

Duncan, V. L., Holt, E. A., & Keenan, S. M. (2023, September). Creating an equitable and inclusive STEM classroom: A qualitative meta-synthesis of approaches and practices in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1154652.

Durm, M. W. (1993). An A is not an A is not an A: A history of grading. The Educational Forum, 57(3), 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729309335429

Durodoye, R., Gumpertz, M., Wilson, A., Griffith, E., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Tenure and promotion outcomes at four large land grant universities: Examining the roles of gender, race and academic discipline. Research in Higher Education, 61, 628–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09573-9

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040.

___. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.

___. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 643–691). John Wiley & Sons.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

Dyer, W. G., Jr., Dyer, J. H., & Dyer, W. G. (2013). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Dysart, S. A., & Weckerle, C. (2015). Professional development in higher education: A model for meaningful technology integration. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 14, 255.

Eagan, K., Hurtado, H., Figueroa, T., & Hughes, B. (2014). [Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2- and 4- Year STEM Degrees, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Eberly, M. B., Newton, S. E., & Wiggins, R. A. (2001). The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. The Journal of General Education, 56–74.

Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., & Allred, S. (1997). Innovation in large lectures: Teaching for active learning. Bioscience, 47(9), 601–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313166

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed.). Wiley.

Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Thummaphan, P., Lan, M. C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). Caution, student experience may vary: Social identities impact a student’s experience in peer discussions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-05-0108

Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

Edgerton, A. K. (2022). Strengthening career and technical education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V): A primer. Congressional Research Service.

Edmunds, J. A., Unlu, F., Phillips, B., Mulhern, C., & Hutchins, B. C. (2024). CTE-focused dual enrollment: Participation and outcomes. Education Finance and Policy, 19(4), 612–633.

Edwards, J. D., Barthelemy, R. S., & Frey, R. F. (2022). Relationship between course-level social belonging (sense of belonging and belonging uncertainty) and academic performance in general chemistry 1. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00405

Edwards, J. D., Torres, H. L., & Frey, R. F. (2023). The effect of social belonging on persistence to general chemistry 2. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(11), 4190–4199. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01048

Edwards, R. (1999). The academic department: How does it fit into the university reform agenda? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(5), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389909604219

Egger, A. E. (2019). The role of introductory geoscience courses in preparing teachers—And all students—For the future: Are we making the grade? GSA Today, 29(10), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG393A.1

Egger, A. E., & Robinson, W. (2024). Geoscience departments can “phone a friend” for support. Eos, 105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EO240266.

Egger, A. E., Viskupic, K., & Iverson, E. R. (2019). Results of the National Geoscience Faulty Survey (2004-2016). National Association of Geoscience Teachers. https://cdn.serc.carleton.edu/files/NAGTWorkshops/CE_geo_survey/nationalsurveyreportforagu.v3.pdf

Ekstrom, R. B., Villegas, A. M., Bruschi, B. A., & Cline, F. A. (1994). College grades: An exploratory study of policies and practices. ETS Research Report Series, 1994(1), i–33.

El Baze, J. A., Stowe, S., Hood, S., Lawford, H., Jensen, M., & Hull, K. (2018). Academic anxiety in higher education: Causes, implications, and potential solutions. HAPS Educator, 22(3), 208–219.

Elliott, D. C., & Lakin, J. M. (2020). Running the STEM gauntlet: The complicity of four-year universities in the transfer penalty. Research in Higher Education, 61, 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09586-4

Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.54.1.5

Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447

Emery, N. C., Maher, J. M., & Ebert-May, D. (2020). Early-career faculty practice learner-centered teaching up to 9 years after postdoctoral professional development. Science Advances, 6(25), eaba2091. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba2091

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

England, B. J., Brigati, J. R., Schussler, E. E., & Chen, M. M. (2019). Student anxiety and perception of difficulty impact performance and persistence in introductory biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), Article 21.

Equity-Based Teaching Collective. (2024). Equity-based teaching in higher education: The levers that institutions can use for scaling improvement. Equity-Based Teaching Collective. https://transformlearning.everylearnereverywhere.org/equity-teaching/equitybased-teaching-report/

Erickson, O. A., Cole, R. B., Isaacs, J. M., Alvarez-Clare, S., Arnold, J., Augustus-Wallace, A., Ayoob, J. C., Berkowitz, A., Branchaw, J., Burgio, K. R., Cannon, C. H., Ceballos, R. M., Cohen, C. S., Coller, H., Disney, J., Doze, V. A., Eggers, M. J., Farina, S., Ferguson, E. L., Gray, J. J., … Dolan, E. L. (2022). “How do we do this at a distance?!” A descriptive study of remote undergraduate research programs during COVID-19. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0125

Esarey, J., & Valdes, N. (2020). Unbiased, reliable, and valid student evaluations can still be unfair. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1106–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1724875.

Eslami, M., Denaro, K., Collins, P., Sumarsono, J. M., Dennin, M., & Sato, B. (2024). How syllabi relate to outcomes in higher education: A study of syllabi learner-centeredness and grade inequities in STEM. PLoS One, 19(4), e0301331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301331

Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u

Espinosa, L. L., Turk, J. M., & Taylor, M. (2017). Pulling back the curtain: Enrollment and outcomes at Minority Serving Institutions. American Council on Education & Center for Policy Research and Strategy. https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Pulling-Back-the-Curtain-Enrollment-and-Outcomes-at-MSIs.pdf

Evans, C. A., Chen, R., & Hudes, R. P. (2020). Understanding determinants for STEM major choice among students beginning community college. Community College Review, 48(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120917214

Eyler, J. R. (2024). Failing our future: How grades harm students, and what we can do about it. JHU Press.

ExcelinEd. (2018). College and career pathways: Equity and access. https://www.excelined.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ExcelinEd.Report.CollegeCareerPathways.CRDCAnalysis.2018.pdf

Fairweather, J. (2008). [Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report for the National Academies’ National Research Council Board on Science Education]. Commissioned paper for the National Academies Workshop: Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. https://www.nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/Xc--Linking_Evidence--Fairweather.pdf

Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777129

Farrar, V. S., Aguayo, B.-Y. C., & Caporale, N. (2023). Gendered performance gaps in an upper-division biology course: Academic, demographic, environmental, and affective factors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-03-0041

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2024). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Feldman, J. (2023). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Feldon, D. F., Shukla, K. D., & Anne Maher, M. (2016). Faculty–student coauthorship as a means to enhance STEM graduate students’ research skills. International Journal for Researcher Development, 7(2), 178–191.

Feola, S., Lewis, J. E., McAlpin, J. D., Prevost, L. B., Skvoretz, J., Stains, M., Couch, B. A., Earl, B., Ziker, J. P., Lane, A. K., & Shadle, S. E. (2023). STEM education institutional change projects: Examining enacted approaches through the lens of the Four Categories of Change Strategies Model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00458-z

Ferguson, R., & Whitelock, D. (2024). Assessing microcredentials. In R. Ferguson & D. Whitelock, Microcredentials for excellence: A practical guide (p. 173).

Fernandez, C., & Chokshi, S. (2002). A practical guide to translating lesson study for a US setting. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400208

Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00030-A

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531.

Ferns, S., Hickey, R., & Williams, H. (2021). Ungrading, supporting our students through a pedagogy of care. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 12(2), 4500–4504. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2021.0550

Ferrare, J. J. (2019). A multi-institutional analysis of instructional beliefs and practices in gateway courses to the sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0257

Feygin, A., Nolan, L., Hickling, A., & Friedman, L. (2020, January). Evidence for networked improvement communities: A systematic review of the literature. American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/NIC-Systematic-Review-Report-123019-Jan-2020.pdf

Fiegener, M. K., & Proudfoot, S. L. (2013). Baccalaureate origins of US-trained S&E doctorate recipients (NSF No. 13-323). National Science Foundation.

Finelli, C. J., Nguyen, K., DeMonbrun, M., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Husman, J., Henderson, C., Shekhar, P., & Waters, C. K. (2018). Reducing student resistance to active learning: Strategies for instructors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(5).

Fink, A., Frey, R. F., & Solomon, E. D. (2020). Belonging in general chemistry predicts first-year undergraduates’ performance and attrition. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00053A

Fink, J., Myers, T., Sparks, D., & Smith Jaggars, S. (2024). Toward a practical set of STEM transfer program momentum metrics. Research in Higher Education, 65(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09759-2

Finkelstein, I. E. (1913). The marking system in theory and practice (No. 10). Warwick & York.

Finkelstein, N., Greenhoot, A. F., Weaver, G., & Austin, A. E. (2020). A department-level cultural change project: Transforming evaluation of teaching. In K. White, A. Beach, N. Finkelstein, C. Henderson, S. Simkins, L. Slakey, M. Stains, G. Weaver, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Accelerating systemic change in higher education. Pressbooks.

Finnegan, D. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1996). Disciplinary adaptations to research culture in comprehensive institutions. The Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 141–177.

Fisher, K. M., (2004). The importance of prior knowledge in college science instruction. In D. W. Sunal, E. L. Wright, & J. B. Day (Eds.), Reform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st century (pp. 69–94). Information Age Publishing.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Fitzsimmons, S. J., Carlson, K., Kerpelman, L.C., & Stoner, D. (1990). A preliminary evaluation of the Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Program of the National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation.

Flaherty, C. (2022, October 30). Ratings and gender bias, over time. Insider Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2022/10/31/ratings-and-bias-against-women-over-time

Fleischner, T. L., Espinoza, R. E., Gerrish, G. A., Greene, H. W., Kimmerer, R. W., Lacey, E. A., Pace, S., Parrish, J. K., Swain, H. M., Trombulak, S. C., Weisberg, S., Winkler, D. W., & Zander, L. (2017). Teaching biology in the field: Importance, challenges, and solutions. BioScience, 67(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036

Fletcher, E. C., Lasonen, J. L., & Hernandez-Gantes, V. M. (2013). What is CTE?: Practitioners struggle to define their field in the United States. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET), 4(1), 16–30. http://doi.org/10.4018/javet.2013010102

Flores, G. M., Bañuelos, M., & Harris, P. R. (2023). “What are you doing here?”: Examining minoritized undergraduate student experiences in STEM at a minority serving institution. Journal for STEM Education Research, 7, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00103-y

Follmer Greenhoot, A., Ward, D., Bernstein, D., Patterson, M. M., & Colyott, K. (2020). Benchmarks for teaching effectiveness. Center for Teaching Excellence. https://cte.ku.edu/evaluating-teaching

Fornauf, B. S., & Erickson, J. D. (2020). Toward an inclusive pedagogy through universal design for learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(2), 183–199.

Fox Tree, J. E., & Vaid, J. (2022). Why so few, still? Challenges to attracting, advancing, and keeping women faculty of color in academia. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.792198

Frady, K. (2023). Challenges, barriers, and opportunities for two-year college STEM professional development. In S. M. Linder, C. M. Lee, S. K. Stefl, & K. High (Eds.), Handbook of STEM faculty development (pp. 27–38). Information Age Publishing.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105

Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194

Friedensen, R., Lauterbach, A., Kimball, A., & Mwangi, C. E. (2021). Students with high-incidence disabilities in STEM: Barriers encountered in postsecondary learning environments. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 34(1), 77–90.

Fries-Britt, S., & White-Lewis, D. (2020). In pursuit of meaningful relationships: How black males perceive faculty interactions in STEM. The Urban Review, 52(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00559-x

Fry, R., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial, and ethnic diversity. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/04/01/stem-jobs-see-uneven-progress-in-increasing-gender-racial-and-ethnic-diversity/

Fryberg, S. A., & Markus, H. R. (2007). Cultural models of education in American Indian, Asian American and European American contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 213–246.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., Boucher, K. L., Murphy, M. C., Manson, D. L., & Safer, B. L. (2019). Growing STEM: Perceived faculty mindset as an indicator of communal affordances in STEM. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000154

Fuesting, M. A., Diekman, A. B., & Hudiburgh, L. (2017). From classroom to career: The unique role of communal processes in predicting interest in STEM careers. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9398-6

Fujii, A. (2024). Exploring autonomy support and learning preference in higher education: introducing a flexible and personalized learning environment with technology. Discover Education, 3(1), 26.

Fuller, R., Brown, M. K., & Smith, K. (Eds.). (2023). Adjunct faculty voices: Cultivating professional development and community at the front lines of higher education. Taylor & Francis.

Funk, C., & Parker, K. (2018, January 9). Diversity in the STEM workforce varies widely across jobs. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/diversity-in-the-stem-workforce-varies-widely-across-jobs/#:~:text=Growth%20of%20employment%20in%20STEM,overall%20employment%20grew%20only%2034%25

Gao, Z., Heckman, S., & Lynch, C. (2022, February). Who uses office hours? A comparison of in-person and virtual office hours utilization. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Vol. 1, pp. 300–306). https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499334

García, H. A., Bryan, K., & McNaughtan, J. (2019). “Why not?”: How STEM identity development promotes black transfer and transition. Journal of Negro Education, 88(3), 343–357.

Garcia, H. A., McNaughtan, J., & Nehls, K. (2017). The current and future state of contingent faculty. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2017(176), 111–115.

Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31–41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ960634

Garvey, J. C., & Dolan, C. V. (2021). Queer and trans college student success: A comprehensive review and call to action. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 36, pp. 161–215).

Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012, March 01). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003

___. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Gebauer, R. (2019). The critical nature of intentionality when supporting academically underprepared students through learning communities. Learning Communities: Research & Practice, 7(1), 3.

Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2016). STEM reform outcomes through communities of transformation. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1121084

___. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833.

Ghanat, S. T., Kaklamanos, J., Ziotopoulou, K., Immanuel, S., & Fallon, D. J. (2016, June). A multi-institutional study of pre-and post-course knowledge surveys in undergraduate geotechnical engineering courses. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Ghazzawi, D., Pattison, D., & Horn, C. (2021, July). Persistence of underrepresented minorities in STEM fields: Are summer bridge programs sufficient? Frontiers in Education, 6, 630529.

Gildersleeve, R. E., Croom, N. N., & Vasquez, P. L. (2011). “Am I going crazy?!”: A critical race analysis of doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.539472

Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2017). QuantCrit: education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417

Gilley, B., Atchison, C., Feig, A., & Stokes, A. (2015). Impact of inclusive field trips. Nature Geoscience, 8(8), 579–580.

Gilley, B. H., & Clarkston, B. (2014). Collaborative testing: Evidence of learning in a controlled in-class study of undergraduate students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(3), 83–91.

Gin, L. E., Guerrero, F. A., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Is active learning accessible? Exploring the process of providing accommodations to students with disabilities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4), es12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-03-0049

Gin, L. E., Scott, R. A., Pfeiffer, L. D., Zheng, Y., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2021). It’s in the syllabus…or is it? How biology syllabi can serve as communication tools for creating inclusive classrooms at a large-enrollment research institution. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00119.2020

Glassick C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. Jossey-Bass.

Glisson, H. E. (2023). The dynamics of belonging among undergraduate women in engineering [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/116339

Glover, W. J., Farris, J. A., & Van Aken, E. M. (2015). The relationship between continuous improvement and rapid improvement sustainability. International Journal of Production Research, 53(13), 4068–4086.

Go, J. (2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26953572

Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Pew Charitable Trusts. https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~oliver/sociology/PhDEducationreport.pdf

Goldstein, B. E., Chase, C., Frankel-Goldwater, L., Osborne-Gowey, J., Risien, J., & Schweizer, S. (2017). Transforming with a soft touch: Comparing four learning networks. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(5), 537–543.

Gong, H. J., Park, H., & Hagood, T. C. (2023). Peer learning in STEM: A qualitative study of a student oriented active learning intervention program. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 1922–1932.

Gonzales, L. D. (2018). Subverting and minding boundaries: The intellectual work of women. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 677–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278

Gonzales, L. D., Bhangal, N. K., Stokes, C., & Rosales, J. (2024a). Faculty hiring: Exercising professional jurisdiction over epistemic matters. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2024.2301915

Gonzales, L. D., & Culpepper, D. K. (2024). [A framework for change agents: Fostering equity-minded change within and across STEM tea and learning contexts]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Equitable and Effective Teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Framework for Institutions, Educators, and Disciplines. The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Gonzales, L. D., Culpepper, D., & Anderson, J. (2024b). An analysis of academic hiring research and practice and a lens for the future: How labor justice can make a better academy. In L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 39, pp. 381–471). Springer Nature Switzerland.

Gonzales, L. D., Pasque, P. A., Farris, K. D., & Hansen, J. M. (2024c). Epistemic injustice and legitimacy in U.S. doctoral education: A systematic review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 94(3), 423–464. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231187628

González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.

Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202288010

González-Stokas, A. G. (2023). Reparative universities: Why diversity alone won’t solve racism in higher ed. John Hopkins University Press.

Goodell, J. E., & Koç, S. (Eds.). (2020). Preparing STEM teachers: The UTeach replication model. Information Age Publishing.

Goose, M. (2024). “Aaniikoobidooyaang” — Tying things together: Ojibwe language revitalization at Fond du Lac Tribal and Community College. Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 35(3).

Gordon, C., Snare, J., & Rajasekhar, Y. (2024). Incorporating learning sciences’ best practices into STEM courseware. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 7076–7085). IATED.

Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485.

Gosselin, D. C., Manduca, C. A., Bralower, T. J., & Egger, A. E. (2019). Preparing students to address grand challenges and wicked problems: The InTeGrate Approach. In D. C. Gosselin, A. E. Egger, & J. J. Taber (Eds.), Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03273-9

Grace-Odeleye, B., & Santiago, J. (2019). A review of some diverse models of summer bridge programs for first-generation and at-risk college students. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 9(1), 35–47.

Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947

Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2021). Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 345–361. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2021.1903617

Grant, J. (2021). No, I’m not crazy: A Black feminist perspective of gaslighting within doctoral socialization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(10), 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1930258

Graves, B. C. (2023). Specifications grading to promote student engagement, motivation, and learning: Possibilities and cautions. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100754

Graves, J. L., Jr., Kearney, M., Barabino, G., & Malcom, S. (2022). Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(10), e2117831119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117831119

Griffin, K. A. (2020). Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 35, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11743-6_4-1

Griffin, K. A., Bennett, J. C., & Harris, J. (2013). Marginalizing merit?: Gender differences in Black faculty D/discourses on tenure, advancement, and professional success. The Review of Higher Education, 36(4), 489–512.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Griffith, A. S., & Altinay, Z. (2020). A framework to assess higher education faculty workload in US universities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 691–700.

Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge & teacher education. Teachers College Press.

Gube, M. (2019). Higher ideation: Supporting creative thinking and adaptive expertise in undergraduate STEM students. McGill University.

Gube, M., & Lajoie, S. (2020). Adaptive expertise and creative thinking: A synthetic review and implications for practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100630.

Guerrero, M., & Rod, A. B. (2013). Engaging in office hours: A study of student-faculty interaction and academic performance. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2013.835554

Guskey, T. R. (1994). Making the grade: What benefits students. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 14–20.

Gutiérrez, J. B. (n.d.). A department, transformed. UTSA College of Sciences. https://sciences.utsa.edu/mathematics/word-from-chair.html

Guzzardo, M. T., Khosla, N., Adams, A. L., Bussmann, J. D., Engleman, A., Ingraham, N., Gamba, R., Jones-Bey, A., Moore, M. D., Toosi, N. R., & Taylor, S. (2021). “The ones that care make all the difference”: Perspectives on student-faculty relationships. Innovative Higher Education, 46(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09522-w

Gyll, S. P., & Hayes, H. (2024). Training for better transfer in an online competency-based higher education program: Using enhanced technology-based instruction to improve student learning and assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Testing Technology. http://www.jattjournal.net/index.php/atp/article/view/173213

Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820

Hackerson, E. L., Slominiski, T., Johnson, N., Buncher, J. B., Ismael, S., Singlemann, L., Leontyev, A., Knopps, A. G., McDarby, A., Nguyen, J. J., Condry, D. L. J., Nyachwaya, J. M., Wissman, K. T., Falkner, W., Grieger, K., Montplaisir, L., Hodgson, A., & Momsen, J. L. (2024). Alternative grading practices in undergraduate STEM education: A scoping review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), 15.

Hagenauer, G. & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613

Hakkola, L., Ruben, M. A., McDonnell, C., Herakova, L. L., Buchanan, R., & Robbie, K. (2021). An equity-minded approach to faculty development in a community of practice. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09540-8

Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023219

Hallett, R. E., Kezar, A., Perez, R. J., & Kitchen, J. A. (2020). A typology of college transition and support programs: Situating a 2-year comprehensive college transition program within college access. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(3), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869410

Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.

Hampel, R. (2021). Book review of The amateur hour: A history of college teaching in America by Jonathan Zimmerman. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods, 46(1), 27–28.

Han, S., Liu, D., & Lv, Y. (2022). The influence of psychological safety on students’ creativity in project-based learning: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865123/full

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., & Hatfull, G. F. (2016). A measure of college student persistence in the sciences (PITS). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-09-0185

Hansen, M. J., Palakal, M. J., & White, L. (2023). The importance of STEM sense of belonging and academic hope in enhancing persistence for low-income, underrepresented STEM students. Journal for STEM Education Research, 7, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00096-8

Hanson, M. (December 2024). College enrollment & student demographic statistics. Education Data Initiative. https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics

Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Giffen, C. J., Blair, S. S., Rouse, D. I., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 196(2), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034679

Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542

Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press.

Harlow, D. B., Otero, V. K., Leak, A. E., Robinson, S., Price, E., & Goldberg, F. (2020). Learning about teaching and learning while learning physics: An analysis of 15 years of responsive curriculum development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020155. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020155

Harper, R. P., Weston, T. J., & Seymour, E. (2019). Students’ perceptions of good STEM teaching. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 245–276). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_8

Harris, L. M., Campbell, J. T., & Brophy, A. L. (Eds.). (2019). Slavery and the university: History and legacies. University of Georgia Press.

Harris, R. B., Mack, M. R., Bryant, J., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2020). Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone.” Science Advances, 6(24), eaaz5687. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5687

Harrison, C., & Tanner, K. D. (2018). Language matters: Considering microaggressions in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), fe4.

Harrison, J. M., & Williams, V. R. (2023). A guide to curriculum mapping: Creating a collaborative, transformative, and learner-centered curriculum. Taylor & Francis.

Harsh, J. A., Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2012). A perspective of gender differences in chemistry and physics undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200581m

Harsy, A., Carlson, C., & Klamerus, L. (2021). An analysis of the impact of mastery-based testing in mathematics courses. PRIMUS, 31(10), 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1809041

Hartikainen, S., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2022). Engineering students’ perceptions of teaching: Teacher-created atmosphere and teaching procedures as triggers of student emotions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 814–832.

Harwell, E. (2013). Students’ perceptions of differential tuition based on academic program and the impact on major choice [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].

Hastings, E. C., & West, R. L. (2011). Goal orientation and self-efficacy in relation to memory in adulthood. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.575926

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Hatch, J. A. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.

Hatfield, N., Brown, N., & Topaz, C. M. (2022). Do introductory courses disproportionately drive minoritized students out of STEM pathways? PNAS Nexus, 1(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac167

Hatmaker, D. M. (2013). Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineer. Gender, Work, and Organization, 20(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x

Hattan, C., Alexander, P. A., & Lupo, S. M. (2024). Leveraging what students know to make sense of texts: What the research says about prior knowledge activation. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 73–111.

Haynes, C., & Patton, L. D. (2019). From racial resistance to racial consciousness: Engaging White STEM faculty in pedagogical transformation. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 22(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458919829845

Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.

Hecht, C. A., Bryan, C. J., & Yeager, D. S. (2023). A values-aligned intervention fosters growth mindset–supportive teaching and reduces inequality in educational outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(25), e2210704120.

Hecht, C. A., Latham, A, G., Buskrirk, R. E., Hansen, D. R., & Yeager, D. S. (2022). Peer-modeled mindsets: An approach to customizing life sciences studying interventions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), Article 82. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-07-0143

Heffernan, T. (2021). Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 144–154. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075

Henderson, B. C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439

Henderson, C., Khan, R., & Dancy, M. (2018). Will my student evaluations decrease if I adopt an active learning instructional strategy? American Journal of Physics, 86(12), 934–942.

Henry, M. A., Shorter, S., Charkoudian, L., Heemstra, J. M., & Corwin, L. A. (2019). FAIL is not a four-letter word: A theoretical framework for exploring undergraduate students’ approaches to academic challenge and responses to failure in STEM learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-06-0108

Heringer, R. (2018). The pertinence of a culturally relevant pedagogy in internationalized higher education. International Education Studies, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p1

Herman, G. L., Greene, J. C., Hahn, L. D., Mestre, J. P., Tomkin, J. H., & West, M. (2018). Changing the teaching culture in introductory STEM courses at a large research university. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(6), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_32

Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029691

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Hess, R. A., Erickson, O. A., Cole, R. B., Isaacs, J. M., Alvarez-Clare, S., Arnold, J., Augustus-Wallace, A., Ayoob, J. C., Berkowitz, A., Branchaw, J., Burgio, K. R., Cannon, C. H., Ceballos, R. M., Cohen, C. S., Coller, H., Disney, J., Doze, V. A., Eggers, M. J., Ferguson, E. L., Gray, J. J., Greenberg, J. T., Hoffmann, Al., Jensen,-Ryan, D., … Dolan, E. L. (2023). Virtually the same? Evaluating the effectiveness of remote undergraduate research experiences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(2), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-01-0001

Higher Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-329, 79 Stat. 1219 (1965), codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. § 1070 et seq.

Hill, L. B. (2023). Advancing SoTL through boundary-spanning leadership: A study of four CIRTL institutions. Innovative Higher Education, 48(6), 1033–1054.

Hill, L. B., Austin, A. E., Bantawa, B., & Savoy, J. N. (2019a). Factors of success: Building and sustaining teaching professional development opportunities for doctoral students and postdocs. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1168–1182.

Hill, L. B., Savoy, J. N., Austin, A. E., & Bantawa, B. (2019b). The impact of multi-institutional STEM reform networks on member institutions: A case study of CIRTL. Innovative Higher Education, 44, 187–202.

Hilliard, J., Kear, K., Donelan, H., & Heaney, C. (2020). Students’ experiences of anxiety in an assessed, online, collaborative project. Computers & Education, 143, 103675.

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 573–590.

Hines, S. R. (2017). Evaluating centers for teaching and learning: A field-tested model. To Improve the Academy, 36(2), 89–100.

Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities. (2024). About Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). https://www.hacu.net/hacu/About_HSIs.asp

Hogan, K. A., & Sathy, V. (2022). Inclusive teaching: Strategies for promoting equity in the college classroom. West Virginia University Press.

Holland, D. G. (2019). The struggle to belong and thrive. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 277–327). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_9

Holland, D. G., Harper, R. P., Hunter, A.-B., Weston, T. J., & Seymour, E. (2019a). The processes and consequences of switching, including the loss of high-performing STEM majors. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 329–369). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_10

Holland, D. G., Harper, R. P., & Seymour, E. (2019b). Influences beyond college that shape revised choices. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 371–398). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_11

Holland Zahner, D. G., & Harper, R. P. (2022). Validation of belonging among underrepresented undergraduates in STEM majors: Comparison of former transfer and non-transfer students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15210251221146119.

Holley, K. (2009). The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education, 58, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9193-6

Hong, A., Etemadi, A., & Hilliard, A. (2021). Credential quality in career and technical education. Project on Workforce at Harvard Summer Fellowship Series.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Hood, S., Barrickman, N., Djerdjian, N., Farr, M., Magner, S., Roychowdhury, H., Gerrits, R., Lawford, H., Ott, B., Ross, K., Paige, O., Stowe, S., Jensen, M., & Hull, K. (2021). “I like and prefer to work alone”: Social anxiety, academic self-efficacy, and students’ perceptions of active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-12-0271

Hooper, K. M., & Harrington, C. (2022). Equity gaps in dual enrollment. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 7(3), 20–26.

Hopp, R., Britson, C., Mukhopadhyay, S., Goldina, A., Chapman, M., & Nielsen, M. (2019). Teaching assistants in human anatomy and physiology: Their prevalence, recruitment strategies, funding, retention, and training. HAPS Educator, 23(2), 367–384.

Horii, C., Redd, K., Ouellett, M., Finkelstein, N., Beach, A., Carlisle, D., Shadle, S., & Weaver, G. (2015, November). Collaborating at the centers: Report from a STEM education transformation workshop involving leaders of centers for teaching and learning and STEM education centers. Collaborating at the Centers Workshop.

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Howitz, W. J., McKnelly, K. J., & Link, R. D. (2021). Developing and implementing a specifications grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450

Hrabowski, F. A., III. (2012). Broadening participation in the American STEM workforce. BioScience, 62(4), 325–326. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.4.2

Hsu, E., Murphy, T. J., & Treisman, U. (2008). Supporting high achievement in introductory mathematics courses: What we have learned from 30 years of the emerging scholars program. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research to practice in undergraduate mathematics education (Vol. 73, pp. 203–218). Mathematical Association of America.

Hu, X., & Chan, H. Y. (2021). Does delivery location matter? A national study of the impact of dual enrollment on college readiness and early academic momentum. Teachers College Record, 123(4), 1–32.

Huber, N. S. (2002). Approaching leadership education in the new millennium. Journal of Leadership Education, 1(1), 25–34.

Hudesman, J., Crosby, S., Flugman, B., Issac, S., Everson, H., & Clay, D. B. (2013). Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve student achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(1), 2.

Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), eaao6373. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373

Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506

Hunter, A.-B. (2019). Why undergraduates leave STEM majors: Changes over the last two decades. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 87–114). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_3

Hurlburt, S., & McGarrah, M. (2016). Cost savings or cost shifting? The relationship between part-time contingent faculty and institutional spending. Delta Cost Project at American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Cost-Savings-or-Cost-Shifting-Contingent-Faculty-November-2016.pdf

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2008). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189–214.

Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345.

Hutchings, P. (1996). Building a new culture of teaching & learning. About Campus, 1(5), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.6190010502

Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. Jossey-Bass.

Hyson, A. R., Bonham, B., Hood, S., Deutschman, M. C., Seithers, L. C., Hull, K., & Jensen, M. (2021). Professional development, shifting perspectives, and instructional change among community college anatomy and physiology instructors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-02-0037

Ing, M., Burnette, J. M., Azzam, T., & Wessler, S. R. (2021). Participation in a course-based undergraduate research experience results in higher grades in the companion lecture course. Educational Researcher, 50(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20968097

The Institute for College Access and Success (2023). National rural college completion trends, challenges, and solutions. https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023.-Rural-College-Completion-National-Primer_v2.pdf

Institute of International Education. (2024, November 18). Report on International Educational Exchange. https://opendoorsdata.org/annual-release/international-students/#key-findings

Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge.

Ison, M. P. (2022). Dual enrollment, performance-based funding, and the completion agenda: An analysis of post-secondary credential outcomes of dual enrollment students by credential type. Community College Review, 50(1), 51–70.

Ives, J., & Castillo-Montoya, M. (2020). First-generation college students as academic learners: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 139–178.

Izzo, M. V. & Bauer, W. M. (2015). Universal design for learning: Enhancing achievement and employment of STEM students with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1

Jabbar, H., Epstein, E., Sánchez, J., & Hartman, C. (2021). Thinking through transfer: Examining how community college students make transfer decisions. Community College Review, 49(1), 3–29.

Jackson, D. L., & Laanan, F. S. (2015). Desiring to fit: Fostering the success of community college transfer students in STEM. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.762565

Jackson, M. A., Tran, A., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2018). Peer vs. self-grading of practice exams: Which is better? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), es44. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0052

Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Jackson Smith, D. (2016). Operating in the middle: The experiences of African American female transfer students in STEM degree programs at HBCUs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(12), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1206841

Jagesic, S., Ewing, M., Wyatt, J. N., & Feng, J. (2022). Unintended consequences: Understanding the relationship between dual enrollment participation, college undermatch, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Research in Higher Education, 63(1), 119–139.

Jaimes, P. (2021). Reimagining diversity in STEM: Using an assets-based capital framework model to explore the career trajectory of scientists from underrepresented groups. Michigan State University.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Jaipal-Jamani, K., Figg, C., Gallagher, T., Scott, R. M., & Ciampa, K. (2015). Collaborative professional development in higher education: Developing knowledge of technology enhanced teaching. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(2), 30–44.

James, N. M., & LaDue, N. D. (2021). Pedagogical reform in an introductory chemistry course and the importance of curricular alignment. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(11), 3421–3430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00688

Jenner, B. M. (2017). Student veterans and the transition to higher education: Integrating existing literatures. Journal of Veterans Studies, 2(2), 26–44.

Jensen, G. M., Hack, L. M., Nordstrom, T., Gwyer, J., & Mostrom, E. (2017). National study of excellence and innovation in physical therapist education: Part 2—a call to reform. Physical Therapy, 97(9), 875–888.

Jha, S., Noori, H., & Michela, J. L. (1996). The dynamics of continuous improvement: Aligning organizational attributes and activities for quality and productivity. International Journal of Quality Science, 1(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598539610117975

Johnson, A., & Elliott, S. (2020). Culturally relevant pedagogy: A model to guide cultural transformation in STEM departments. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2097

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389809602629

Johnson, J., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Perspective: Adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students’ careers in academic medicine and the scientific pipeline. Academic Medicine, 87(11), 1488–1495.

Johnson, W. B., & Nelson, N. (1999). Mentor-protégé relationships in graduate training: Some ethical concerns. Ethics and Behavior, 9(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0903_1

Johnstone, S. M., & Soares, L. (2014). Principles for developing competency-based education programs. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(2), 12–19.

Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E., & Villarejo, M. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11778971

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity, and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Jorstad, J., Starobin, S. S., Chen, Y., & Kollasch, A. (2017). STEM aspiration: The influence of social capital and chilly climate on female community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(4–5), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1251358

Kallison, J. M., Jr., & Stader, D. L. (2012). Effectiveness of summer bridge programs in enhancing college readiness. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(5), 340–357.

Kania, J., Kramer, M., & Senge, P. (2018). The water of systems change. FSG. https://www.fsg.org/resource/water_of_systems_change/

Karandjeff, K., & Schiorring, E. (2011). Career and technical education (CTE) transfer research project: Improving transfer pathways for California community college students in CTE programs. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 18(2), 39–48.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Kardash, C. A. M., & Wallace, M. L. (2001). The perceptions of science classes survey: What undergraduate science reform efforts really need to address. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 199–210.

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009

Karsten, J. L. (2019). Insights from the OEDG program on broadening participation in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 287–299.

Katz, V. S., Jordan, A. B., & Ognyanova, K. (2021). Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of U.S. undergraduates. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246641

Katzman, S. D., Hurst-Kennedy, J., Barrera, A., Talley, J., Javazon, E., Diaz, M., & Anzovino, M. E. (2021). The effect of specifications grading on students’ learning and attitudes in an undergraduate-level cell biology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(3), e00200–e00221. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00200-21

Kaufmann, R., & Vallade, J. I. (2022). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: Student perceptions or rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1794–1808. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670

Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001

Keengwe, J., Georgina, D., & Wachira, P. (2010). Faculty training strategies to enhance pedagogy-technology integration. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 6(3), 1–10.

Keith-Le, J. A., & Morgan, M. P. (Eds.). (2020). Faculty experiences in active learning: A collection of strategies for implementing active learning across disciplines. J. Murrey Atkins Library.

Kember, D., Leung, D. Y., & McNaught, C. (2008). A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407086745

Kerr, J. (2014). Western epistemic dominance and colonial structures: Considerations for thought and practice in programs of teacher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2).

Keutzer, C. S. (1993). Midterm evaluation of teaching provides helpful feedback to instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 20(4), 238–240. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2004_12

Kezar, A. (2013). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change (1st ed.). Routledge.

___. (2018). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kezar, A., & Dizon, J. P. M. (2019). Renewing and revitalizing shared governance: A social justice and equity framework. In Higher education administration for social justice and equity (pp. 21–42). Routledge.

Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Bernstein-Sierra, S. (2017). Designing for success in STEM communities of practice: Philosophy and personal interactions. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 217–244.

Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Elrod, S. (2015). Implicit theories of change as a barrier to change on college campuses: An examination of STEM reform. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), 479–506. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0026

Kezar, A., Glenn, W. J., Lester, J., & Nakamoto, J. (2008). Examining organizational contextual features that affect implementation of equity initiatives. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 125–159.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Kezar, A., & Holcombe, E. (2015). Institutional transformation in STEM: Insights from change research and the Keck-PKAL Project. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: 21st century undergraduate STEM education (pp. 35–48). Purdue University Press.

Kezar, A., & Kitchen, J. A. (2020). Supporting first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented students’ transitions to college through comprehensive and integrated programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869397

Kezar, A., & Posselt, J. (2020). Higher education administration for social justice and equity. Critical Perspectives for Leadership.

Kezar, A. J. (2013). Departmental cultures and non-tenure-track faculty: Willingness, capacity, and opportunity to perform at four-year institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(2), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777284

Kezar, K., & Acuna, A. L. (2020). Gender inequality and the new faculty majority. In N. S. Niemi & N. B. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of gender equity in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.

Kim, A. (2021, August 11). History and background: Career prep. Education Writers Association. https://ewa.org/issues/career-technical-education/history-background-career-prep

Kim, Y. A., Cox, J., Southard, K. M., Elfring, L., Blowers, P., & Talanquer, V. (2019). Learning researchers: Promoting formative assessment in STEM courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(5), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2019.12290474

King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781

King-Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Evmenova, A. S., Rao, K., Mergen, R. L., Owen, L. S., & Strimel, M. M. (2023). Achievement of learners receiving UDL instruction: A meta-analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103596.

Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

Kinnunen, P., Butler, M., Morgan, M., Nylen, A., Peters, A. K., Sinclair, J., Kalvala, S., & Pesonen, E. (2018). Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1146233

Kisker, C. B., Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2023). The American community college. Jossey-Bass.

Kitchen, J. A., Cole, D., Rivera, G., & Hallett, R. (2020). The impact of a college transition program proactive advising intervention on self-efficacy. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 58(1), 29–43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19496591.2020.1717963

Kiyama, J. M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2017). Funds of knowledge in higher education honoring students’ cultural experiences and resources as strengths. Routledge.

Klingbeil, N. (2004, June). Rethinking engineering mathematics education: A model for increased retention, motivation, and success in engineering. In 2004 Annual Conference.

Klyce, A., & Ryker, K. (2023). What does a degree in geology actually mean? A systematic evaluation of courses required to earn a bachelor of science in geology in the United States. Journal of Geoscience Education, 71(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2076201

Kober, N. (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687

Koch, A. K. (2017). It’s about the gateway courses: Defining and contextualizing the issue. New Directions for Higher Education, 2017(180), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20257

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Koester, B. P., Grom, G., & McKay, T. A. (2016). Patterns of gendered performance difference in introductory STEM courses. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07565

Koricich, A., Chen, X., & Hughes, R. P. (2018). Understanding the effects of rurality and socioeconomic status on college attendance and institutional choice in the United States. The Review of Higher Education, 41(2), 281–305.

Koutsouris, G., Mountford-Zimdars, A., & Dingwall, K. (2021). The ‘ideal’ higher education student: Understanding the hidden curriculum to enable institutional change. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 26(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.1909921

Kraft, A. R., Atieh, E. L., Shi, L. & Stains, M. (2024a). Prior experiences as students and instructors play a critical role in instructors’ decision to adopt evidence-based instructional practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00478-3

Kraft, T., & Hernández Rodríguez, O. (2024b). Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: A literature review. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 13(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-12-2023-0181

Kravets, M., & Wax, I. (2023). The K&W Guide to colleges for students with learning differences, 16th edition: 350+ schools with programs or services for students with ADHD, ASD, or Lea. Princeton Review.

Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2021). Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in sets and recommendations for ethical reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w

Kressler, B., & Kressler, J. (2020). Diverse student perceptions of active learning in a large enrollment STEM course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i1.24688

Krim, J. S., Cote, L. E., Schwartz, R. S., Stone, E. M., Cleeves, J. J., Barry, K. J., Burgess, W., Buxner, S. R., Gerton, J. M., Horvath, L., Keller, J. M., Lee, S. C., Locke, S. M., & Re-bar, B. M. (2019). Models and impacts of science research experiences: A review of the literature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), Article 65. https://doi.org/10/1187/cbe.19-03-0069

Krishnan, S., Gehrtz, J., Lemons, P. P., Dolan, E. L., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2022). Guides to Advance Teaching Evaluation (GATEs): A resource for STEM departments planning robust and equitable evaluation practices. CBE—Life Sciences, 21, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-08-0198.

Kroeper, K. M., Fried, A. C., & Murphy, M. C. (2022a). Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: Identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindsets beliefs to students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09689-4

Kroeper, K. M., Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2022b). An exploratory study of the behaviors that communicate perceived instructor mindset beliefs in college STEM classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103717

Kuh, G. D. (2016). Making learning meaningful: Engaging students in ways that matter to them. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2016(145), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20174

Kujawa, T. A. (2013). The AAS to BAS pathway: Heating up the educational aspiration of CTE students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(5), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.755648

Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Kyei-Blankson, L., Keengwe, J., & Blankson, J. (2009). Faculty use and integration of technology in higher education. AACE Review, 17(3), 199–213. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28362/

LaCosse, J., Canning, E. A., Bowman, N. A., Murphy, M. C., & Logel, C. (2020). A social-belonging intervention improves STEM outcomes for students who speak English as a second language. Science Advances, 6(40), eabb6543. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb6543

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.

___. (2006). ‘Yes, but how do we do it?’: Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: Creating inclusive schools, building on students’ diversity, and providing true educational equity (pp. 29–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003448709-6/yes-gloria-ladson-billings

___. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Laist, R., Sheehan, D., & Brewer, N. (Eds.). (2022). UDL university: Designing for variability across the postsecondary curriculum. CAST Professional Publishing.

Landrum, R. E., & Mulcock, S. D. (2007). Use of pre- and postcourse surveys to predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(3), 163–166.

Langley, G., Moen, R., Nolan, K., Nolan, T., & Norman, C. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Larson, M. (2023, January 30). What is specifications grading? Center for Transformative Teaching, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. https://teaching.unl.edu/resources/alternative-grading/specification-grading/

Lattuca, L., & Brown, M. (2023). Curriculum-making in higher education: A basis for teaching and learning. In M. N. Bastedo, P. G. Altbach, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the 21st Century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 68–93). John Hopkins University Press.

Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. Jossey-Bass.

Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2011). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. Wiley.

Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5, 129–146.

Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Metacognition in chemistry education: A literature review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 583–597.

Lawrie, G. A., Schultz, M., Bailey, C. H., & Dargaville, B. L. (2019). Personal journeys of teachers: An investigation of the development of teacher professional knowledge and skill by expert tertiary chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00187A

Lawson, C. A., & Fong, C. J. (2024). Undergraduate Latina/o/x motivation and STEM persistence intentions: Moderating influences of community cultural wealth. Journal of Latinx Psychology, 12(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000243

LeBouef, S., & Dworkin, J. (2021). First-generation college students and family support: A critical review of empirical research literature. Education Sciences, 11(6), 294.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Ledesma, M. C., & Fránquiz, M. E. (2015). Introduction: Reflections on Latinas/os, affirmative action, and education. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9(1), 1–7.

Lee, J., Fernandez, F., Ro, H. K., & Suh, H. (2022). Does dual enrollment influence high school graduation, college enrollment, choice, and persistence? Research in Higher Education, 63(5), 825–848.

Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 41–55.

Lee, M., Volpe Horii, C., Austin, E. A., Avery, L., DeSanctis, M., Finkelstein, N., Miller, E., & Schaal, B. (2023). An instructional-workforce framework for coordinated change in undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 55(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2023.2151809

Lee, R., & Ahtone, T. (2020, March 30). Land-grab universities. High Country News. https://www.hcn.org/issues/52-4/indigenous-affairs-education-land-grab-universities/

Leijon, M., Nordmo, I., Tieva, Å., & Troelsen, R. (2022). Formal learning spaces in higher education—A systematic review. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(6), 1460–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2066469

LeMahieu, P. G., Grunow, A., Baker, L., Nordstrum, L. E., & Gomez, L. M. (2017). Networked improvement communities: The discipline of improvement science meets the power of networks. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 5–25.

Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 40(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00401.x

Lenning, O. T., Hill, D. M., Saunders, K. P., Stokes, A., & Solan, A. (2013). Powerful learning communities: A guide to developing student, faculty, and professional learning communities to improve student success and organizational effectiveness (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446385

Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375

Lester, J. (2010). Women in male-dominated career and technical education programs at community colleges: Barriers to participation and success. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i1.40

Lester, J., Struthers, B., & Yamanaka, A. (2017). Unwelcoming classroom climates: The role of gender microaggressions in CTE. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2017(178), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20254

Lester, J., Yamanaka, A., & Struthers, B. (2016). Gender microaggressions and learning environments: The role of physical space in teaching pedagogy and communication. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(11), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1133333

Levy, R. (2019, January 14). VITAL faculty: A growing workforce in colleges and universities. MAA Values. Mathematical Association of America. https://www.mathvalues.org/masterblog/vital-faculty

Lewis, D. (2020). Student anxiety in standards-based grading in mathematics courses. Innovative Higher Education, 45, 153–164.

Li, H., & Xia, X. (2024). Grades as signals of comparative advantage: How letter grades affect major choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 227, 106717.

Li, H., Yu, J., Luo, Y., & Guo, C. (2023). Inclusion and equity: Experiences and dilemmas of disability resource centers at world-class universities. International Journal of Chinese Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X231161859

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Li, Y., & Singh, C. (2023). Sense of belonging is an important predictor of introductory physics students’ academic performance. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020137. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020137

Liera, R. (2023). Expanding faculty members’ zone of proximal development to enact collective agency for racial equity in faculty hiring. The Journal of Higher Education, 94(6), 766–791.

Liera, R., & Desir, S. (2023, July). Taking equity-mindedness to the next level: The equity-minded organization. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1199174.

Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers & Education, 161, 104063.

Limeri, L. B., Carter, N. T., Lyra, F., Martin, J., Mastronardo, H., Patel, J., & Dolan, E. L. (2023). Undergraduate lay theories of abilities: Mindset, universality, and brilliance beliefs uniquely predict undergraduate educational outcomes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(4), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-12-0250

Lindsay, J., Hughes, K., Dougherty, S. M., Reese, K., & Joshi, M. (2024). What we know about the impact of career and technical education: A systematic review of the research.

Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757.

Livers, S. D., Harbour, K. E., & Sullivan, P. L. (2024). (Up)grading: A (re)humanizing assessment process with a focus on feedback. Education Sciences, 14(6), 646.

Logel, C., Iserman, E. C., Davies, P. G., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). The perils of double consciousness: The role of thought suppression in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.016

Logue, A. W., Douglas, D., & Watanabe-Rose, M. (2019). Corequisite mathematics remediation: Results over time and in different contexts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719848777

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Dockter, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 24, 139–142.

Lopez, J. D. (2021). Giving back as an educational outcome for postsecondary Indigenous students. In J. W. Tippeconnic III & M. J. Tippeconnic Fox (Eds.), On Indian ground: The Southwest (pp. 177–190). Information Age Publishing.

Lovecchio, K., & Dundes, L. (2002). Premed survival: Understanding the culling process in premedical undergraduate education. Academic Medicine, 77(7), 719–724.

Lovell, E. D. (2014). College students who are parents need equitable services for retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 16(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.16.2.b

Luke, A., Woods, A., & Weir, K. (Eds.). (2012). Curriculum, syllabus design and equity. Routledge.

Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: An exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8

Lunn, S., Ross, M., Hazari, Z., Weiss, M. A., Georgiopoulos, M., & Christensen, K. (2021). How do educational experiences predict computing identity? ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 22(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470653

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Lyle, K. B., Bego, C. R., Hopkins, R. F., Hieb, J. L., & Ralston, P. A. (2020). How the amount and spacing of retrieval practice affect the short-and-long-term retention of mathematics knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 277–295.

Lytle, A., & Shin, J. E. L. (2023). Self and professors’ incremental beliefs as predictors of STEM engagement among undergraduate students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 1013–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10272-8

Mack, K. (2021). Expand the space, expand the bravery: A practicum for building safe brave spaces within STEM faculty professional development programs. In K. Winter & A. Bramberger (Eds.), Re-conceptualizing safe spaces: Supporting inclusive education (pp. 79–90). Emerald Publishing Limited.

MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4

Mahmud, S. (Ed.). (2024). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence. IGI Global.

Main, J. B., Dang, T., Johnson, B., Shi, Q., Guariniello, C., & Delaurentis, D. (2023, June). Why students choose STEM: A study of high school factors that influence college STEM major choice. ASEE Conferences.

Makela, J. P., Ruud, C. M., Bennett, S., & Bragg, D. D. (2012, March). Investigating applied baccalaureate degree pathways in technician education. Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Malachowski, M. R., Ambos, E. L., Karukstis, K. K., Kinzie, J. L., & Osborn, J. M. (Eds.). (2024). Transforming academic culture and curriculum: Integrating and scaffolding research throughout undergraduate education. Taylor & Francis.

Malcom-Piqueux, L. (2020, October). [Transformation in the U.S. higher education system: Implications for racial equity]. Commissioned paper for the Symposium on Imagining the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/10-21-2020/imagining-the-future-of-undergraduate-stem-education-symposium

Malespina, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Gender gaps in grades versus grade penalties: Why grade anomalies may be more detrimental for women aspiring for careers in biological sciences. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 13. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-023-00399-7

Maltese, A. V., Harsh, J. A., & Svetina, D. (2015). Data visualization literacy: Investigating data interpretation along the novice—expert continuum. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(1), 84–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631889

Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2), e1600193.

Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86.

Marbach-Ad, G., Egan, L. C., & Thompson, K. V. (2016). A disciplinary teaching and learning center: Applying pedagogical content knowledge to faculty development. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 297–311). Purdue University Press.

Marbach-Ad, G., Hunt, C., & Thompson, K. V. (2019). Exploring the values undergraduate students attribute to cross-disciplinary skills needed for the workplace: An analysis of five STEM disciplines. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 452–469.

Marcelo, C., & Yot-Domínguez, C. (2019). From chalk to keyboard in higher education classrooms: Changes and coherence when integrating technological knowledge into pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1429584

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Marco-Bujosa, L. M., Joy, L., & Sorrentino, R. (2021). Nevertheless, she persisted: A comparison of male and female experiences in community college STEM programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(8), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1727382

Margalef, L., & Roblin, N. P. (2018). Unpacking the roles of the facilitator in higher education professional learning communities. In Teacher learning through teacher teams (pp. 41–58). Routledge.

Marín-Spiotta, E., Barnes, R. T., Berhe, A. A., Hastings, M. G., Mattheis, A., Schneider, B., & Williams, B. M. (2020). Hostile climates are barriers to diversifying the geosciences. Advances in Geosciences, 53, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-117-2020

Marín-Spiotta, E., Diaz-Vallejo, E. J., Barnes, R. T., Mattheis, A., Schneider, B., Berhe, A. A., Hastings, M. G., Williams, B. M., & Magley, V. (2023). Exclusionary behaviors reinforce historical biases and contribute to loss of talent in the Earth sciences. Earth’s Future, 11(3), e2022EF002912. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002912

Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364

Marsh, C. C., Marsh, J., & Chesnutt, K. (2022). Exploring OER as a mediator for equity gaps in student course success rates for introductory biology courses in the NCCCS. NC Community College Journal of Teaching Innovation, 1(1), 6–17.

Marshall, A. M., Piatek, J. L., Williams, D. A., Gallant, E., Thatcher, S., Elardo, S., Williams, A. J., Collins, T., & Arroyo, Y. (2022). Flexible fieldwork. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(12), 811.

Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Routledge.

Martin, M. T., Belikov, O., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Fischer, L. (2017). Analysis of student and faculty perceptions of textbook costs in higher education. Open Praxis, 9(1), 79–91.

Martin, T. L., McNair, L. D., & Paretti, M. C. (2015). Comparative dimensions of disciplinary culture. ASEE.

Martinez, A. E., Gehrtz, J., Rasmussen, C., LaTona-Tequida, T., & Vroom, K. (2022). Course coordinator orientations toward their work and opportunities for professional development. Innovative Higher Education, 47(2), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09579-1

Martinez, M. A., Valle, F., Cortez, L. J., Ponjuan, L., & Sáenz, V. B. (2017). Context is key: School leaders’ approaches in creating and maintaining dual enrollment opportunities in South Texas. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 516–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1326149

Massey, M. D. B., Arif, S., Embuldeniya, S., Nanglu, K., & Bielawski, J. (2022). Ten simple rules for succeeding as an underrepresented STEM undergraduate. PLoS Computational Biology, 18(6), e1010101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010101

Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2020). Cultural stereotypes and sense of belonging contribute to gender gaps in STEM. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 12(1), 152–198. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-6353

Mathieu, R. D., Austin, A. E., Barnicle, K. A., Campa, H., III, & McLinn, C. M. (2020). The center for the integration of research, teaching, and learning: A national-scale network to prepare stem future faculty. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(163), 45–53.

Matthews, A. (2022). Changing perceptions of career and technical education (CTE): Bridging the soft skills gap with high quality CTE. St. John’s University.

Matthews, K. E. (2017). Five propositions for genuine students as partners practice. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(2), 1–9.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Matz, R., Koester, B., Fiorini, S., Grom, G., Shepard, L., Stangor, C., Weiner, B., & Mckay, T. (2017). Patterns of gendered performance differences in large introductory courses at five research universities. AERA Open, 3, 233285841774375. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2332858417743754

Matz, R. L., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Posey, L. A., Laverty, J. T., Underwood, S. M., Carmel, J. H., Herrington, D. G., Stowe, R. L., Caballero, M. D., Ebert-May, D., & Cooper, M. M. (2018). Evaluating the extent of a large-scale transformation in gateway science courses. Science Advances, 4(10), 11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau0554

Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Routledge.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.

Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2010). Just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. In Just in time teaching (pp. 39–62). Routledge.

Mazuzan, G. T. (1994). The National Science Foundation: A brief history. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf50/nsf8816.jsp

McAnuff-Gumbs, M., & Verbeck, K. (2013). Toward a model of multi-level professional learning communities to guide the training and practice of literacy coaches. In H. H. Yang, & S. Wang (Eds.), Cases on online learning communities and beyond: Investigations and applications (pp. 361–402). IGI Global.

McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 604–625. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-249.1

McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: A review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584

McFarland, D. A., & Rodan, S. (2009). Organization by design: Supply- and demand-side models of mathematics course taking. Sociology of Education, 82(4), 315–343.

McGee, E. O. (2020). Black, brown, bruised: How racialized STEM educations stifles innovation. Harvard Education Press.

McGinty, M., & Bang, M. (2016). Narratives of dynamic lands: Science education, indigenous knowledge and possible futures. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9685-5

McKnelly, K. J., Morris, M. A., & Mang, S. A. (2021). Redesigning a “writing for chemists” course using specifications grading. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00859

McLean, K. C., Koepf, I. M., & Lilgendahl, J. P. (2022). Identity development and major choice among underrepresented students interested in STEM majors: A longitudinal qualitative analysis. Emerging Adulthood, 10(2), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211015549

McMurtrie, B., & Supiano, B. (2021). The future of teaching: How the classroom is being transformed. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

McNair, J. C. (2016). #WeNeedMirrorsAndWindows: Diverse classroom libraries for K–6 students. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1516

McNair, T. B., Albertine, S., McDonald, N., Major, T., Jr., & Cooper, M. A. (2022). Becoming a student-ready college: A new culture of leadership for student success. John Wiley & Sons.

McNair, T. B., Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. (2020). From equity talk to equity walk: Expanding practitioner knowledge for racial justice in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Mead, C., Buxner, S., Bruce, G., Taylor, W., Semken, S., & Anbar, A. D. (2019). Immersive, interactive virtual field trips promote science learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1565285

Meaders, C. L., Toth, E. S., Lane, A. K., Shuman, J. K., Couch, B. A., Stains, M., Stetzer, M. R., Vinson, E., & Smith, M. K., (2019). “What will I experience in my college STEM courses?” An investigation of student predictions about instructional practices in introductory courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084

Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who’s asking?: Native science, Western science, and science education. MIT Press.

Melidona, D., & Wright, C. E. (2023). Undergraduate military learners: Exploring differences between military learners’ experiences in higher education [Issue brief]. American Council on Education. https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Undergraduate-Military-Learners.pdf

Mensah, F. M., & Jackson, I. (2018). Whiteness as property in science teacher education. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000108

Meraz, A. M. (2022). California community colleges’ journey toward racial equity: Understanding the process of addressing systemic racism. [Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University]. https://hdl.handle.net/2097/42234

Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers’ perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: The importance of the academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 4.

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners.

Metcalf, H., Russell, D., & Hill, C. (2018). Broadening the science of broadening participation in STEM through critical mixed methodologies and intersectionality frameworks. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768872

Meuler, M., Lee, J., Foutch, K., Al-Khayat, N., Boukouzis, K., Christensen, P., Crooks, C., Hassanain, L. M., Karimi, P., Kim, G. V., Randall, A., Redford, I. K., Socko, R., & Theobald, E. J. (2023). Biology in a social context: A comprehensive analysis of humanization in introductory biology textbooks. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1165239.

Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2012). Connecting to the professor: Impact of the student–faculty relationship in a highly challenging course. College Teaching, 60(2), 41–47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/87567555.2011.627576

Michaels, C., & Liu, L. (2020). Differences in Academic achievements among high school graduates’ from four career and technical education (CTE) program areas. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 109–135.

Michela, J. L., Noori, H., & Jha, S. (1996). The dynamics of continuous improvement. International Journal of Quality Science, 1(1), 19–47.

Miller, E. R., & Fairweather, J. S. (2016). The role of cultural change in large-scale STEM reform: The experience of the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 48–66). Purdue University Press.

Miller, S., Kerr, J. E., & Handelsman, J. (2022). AJEDI in science: Leveraging instructor communities to create antiracist curricula. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1), e00248-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00248-21

Mintz, S. (2024). The learning-centered university: Making college a more developmental, transformational, and equitable experience. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Misra, J., Kuvaeva, A., O’Meara, K., Culpepper, D. K., & Jaeger, A. (2021). Gendered and racialized perceptions of faculty workloads. Gender and Society, 35(3), 358–394.

Mitchell, C., & Sickney, L. (2019). Sustainable improvement: Building learning communities that endure. Brill.

Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800001X

Mitchell, M., Leachman, M., & Saenz, M. (2019, October 24). State higher education funding cuts have pushed costs to students, worsened inequality. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/10-24-19sfp.pdf

Mitic, R. R., Zhou, E., & Okahana, H. (2023). Socializing future community college faculty doctoral professional development and career preparation. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2023.2256238

Mitsea, E., & Drigas, A. (2019). A journey into the metacognitive learning strategies. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 15(14).

Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234–1237. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195996

Mogk, D. W. (1993). Undergraduate research experiences as preparation for graduate study in geology. Journal of Geological Education, 41(2), 126–128. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-41.2.126

Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012, April 1). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. In K. A. Kastens, & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences (pp. 131–163). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2486(24)

Molinaro, M., Finkelstein, N., Hogan, K., Mendoza, N., & Sathy, V. (2020). Scholarly teaching for all, research for some: On the roles of research and scholarship of education in the disciplines. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(5), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2020.1807875

Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Qualitative Issues in Educational Research, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

Moll, L. C. (2019). Elaborating funds of knowledge: Community-oriented practices in international contexts. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336919870805

Moll, L. C., & Diaz, S. (1987). Change as the goal of educational research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18(4), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1987.18.4.04x0021u

Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Montplaisir, L., Anderson, E., Grosz, N., & Brewe, E. (2013). Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0130

Morales, N., Bisbee O’Connell, K., McNulty, S., Berkowitz, A., Bowser, G., Giamellaro, M., & Miriti, M. N. (2020). Promoting inclusion in ecological field experiences: Examining and overcoming barriers to a professional rite of passage. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 101(4), e01742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1742

Morcke, A. M., Dornan, T., & Eika, B. (2013). Outcome (competency) based education: An exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 851–863.

Mordacq, J. C., Drane, D. L., Swarat, S. L., & Lo, S. M. (2017). Development of course-based undergraduate research experiences using a design-based approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(4).

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Moreno, S. E., & Mueller, C. (1999). Success and diversity: The transition through first-year calculus in the university. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 30–57.

Morey, A. I., Bezuk, N., & Chiero, R. (1997). Preservice teacher preparation in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 4–24.

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.

Morrison, C. D. (2014). From ‘sage on the stage’ to ‘guide on the side’: A good start. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080104

Morton, T. R., Agee, W., Ashad-Bishop, K. C., Banks, L. D., Barnett, Z. C., Bramlett, I. D., Brown, B., Gassmann, W., Grayson, K., Hollowell, G. P., Kaggwa, R., Kandlikar, G. S., Love, M., McCoy, W. N., Melton, M. A., Miles, M. L., Quinlan, C. L., Roby, R. S., Rorie, C. J., Russo-Tait, T., Wardin, A. M., & Woodson, A. N. (2023). Re-envisioning the culture of undergraduate biology education to foster Black student success: A clarion call. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(4), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-09-0175

Morton, T. R., & Parsons, E. C. (2018). #BlackGirlMagic: The identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education. Science Education, 102(6), 1363–1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21477

Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C., Jr. (2001). Organizing algebra: The need to voice a demand. Social Policy, 31(4), 4.

Mosher, S., & Keane, C. M. (Eds.). (2021). Vision and change in the geosciences: The future of undergraduate education. American Geosciences Institute.

Mountjoy, J. (2022). Community colleges and upward mobility. American Economic Review, 112(8), 2580–2630.

Mowreader, A. (2023, April 19). Academic success tip: Rebrand office hours. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2023/04/19/academic-success-tip-rebrand-office-hours

___. (2024, January 16). Report: 4 ways to promote rural college student enrollment, completion. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/01/16/four-challenges-rural-college-completion-persistence#:~:text=Nationally%2C%2029%20percent%20of%20young,U.S.%20Department%20of%20Education%20data

Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119–2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763

Muenks, K., Kroeper, K. M., Canning, E. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2024). Instructor mindset beliefs and behaviors: How do students and instructors perceive them? Social Psychology of Education, 27(6), 2883–2899.

Murphy, M. C. (2024). Cultures of growth: How the new science of mindset can transform individuals, teams, and organizations. Simon & Schuster.

Murphy, M. C., Gopalan, M., Carter, E. R., Emerson, K. T., Bottoms, B. L., & Walton, G. M. (2020). A customized belonging intervention improves retention of socially disadvantaged students at a broad-access university. Science Advances, 6(29), eaba4677. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4677

Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995

Murphy, M. C., & Taylor, V. J. (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 16–33). Oxford Academic.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Murzi, H., Martin, T. L., McNair, L. D., & Paretti, M. C. (2016). A longitudinal study of the dimensions of disciplinary culture to enhance innovation and retention among engineering students.

Murzi, H., Ulloa, B. C. R., Gamboa, F., Woods, J. C., Guerra, M. A., Soto, K. D. M., & Azar, R. H. (2021, July). Cultural dimensions in academic disciplines, a comparison between Ecuador and the United States of America. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.

Muscanell, N. (2024). The teaching and learning workforce in higher education, 2024. EDUCASE. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2024/the-teaching-and-learning-workforce-in-higher-education-2024/introduction-and-key-findings

Nachman, B. R. (2024). “What do we have to do?” Community college CTE faculty perceptions, preparedness, and propositions in supporting disabled students’ employment opportunities. Community College Review, 00915521231222273.

Nasir, N. I. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2020). Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. Taylor & Francis.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for two-year and four-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21739

___. (2017a). Service-learning in undergraduate geosciences: Proceedings of a workshop. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24621

___. (2017b). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24622

___. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783

___. (2019c). Minority Serving Institutions: America’s underutilized resource for strengthening the STEM workforce. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25257

___. (2019a). Monitoring educational equity. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25389

___. (2019b). The science of effective mentorship in STEMM. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568

___. (2020). Recognizing and evaluating science teaching in higher education: Proceedings of a workshop—in brief. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25685

___. (2021). Undergraduate and graduate STEM students’ experiences during COVID-19: Proceedings of a virtual workshop series. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1017226/26024

___. (2022). Defense research capacity at historically Black colleges and universities and other minority institutions: Transitioning from good intentions to measurable outcomes. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26399

___. (2023). Advancing antiracism, diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM organizations: Beyond broadening participation. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26803

___. (2024a). Equity in K-12 STEM education: Framing decisions for the future. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26859

___. (2024b). A plan to promote defense research at Minority-Serving Institutions. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27838

___. (2024c). Graduate students as part of the instructional workforce for undergraduate STEM education. The National Academies Press. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/43862_10-2024_graduate-students-as-part-of-the-instructional-workforce-for-undergraduate-stem-education

National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). (2024a). Resources. https://nacubostudentsuccess.org/resources/

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

___. (2024b, July 8). Charting the future: NACUBO’s blueprint for student-centered strategic finance. https://www.nacubo.org/Publications/The-Solutions-Exchange/Charting-the-Future-NACUBOs-Blueprint-for-Student-Centered-Strategic-Finance

___. (2024c, July 8). NACUBO Student Success Hub highlights financial links to equitable student outcomes. https://www.nacubo.org/Press-Releases/2024/NACUBO-Student-Success-Hub-Highlights-Financial-Links-to-Equitable-Student-Outcomes

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (n.d.a). About CTE statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ctes/about.asp

___. (n.d.b). Fast facts. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61

___. (n. d.c). Trend generator. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/TrendGenerator/app/build-table/8/35?cid=5#:~:text=Financial%20Aid%3A%20What%20is%20the,is%20based%20on%205%2C519%20institutions

___. (2019). Table 2-6: Disability status of undergraduate students, by age, institution type, financial aid, and enrollment status: 2016. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data

___. (2022, December). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Digest of Education Statistics 2022, Table 303.70.

___. (2023a). Characteristics of postsecondary students. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/csb/postsecondary-students

___. (2023b). Table 304.15. Total fall enrollment in public degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by state or jurisdiction: Selected years, 1970 through 2022. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_304.15.asp

___. (2023c). Table 304.20. Total fall enrollment in private degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by state or jurisdiction: Selected years, 1970 through 2022. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_304.20.asp

___. (2023d). Table 311.10. Number and percentage distribution of students enrolled in postsecondary institutions, by level, disability status, and selected student characteristics: Academic year 2019–20. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_311.10.asp

___. (2023e). Table 316.80. Percentage of degree-granting postsecondary institutions with a tenure system and percentage of full-time faculty with tenure at these institutions, by control and level of institution and selected characteristics of faculty: Selected academic years, 1993-94 through 2022-23. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_316.80.asp

___. (2024a). Characteristics of postsecondary faculty. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/csc/postsecondary-faculty

___. (2024b). Immediate College Enrollment Rate. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cpa

___. (2024c). Postsecondary outcomes for nontraditional and traditional undergraduate students. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/ctu#:~:text=See%20Digest%20of%20Education%20Statistics,30%20percent%20in%202009%E2%80%9310

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2023a). Diversity and STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities 2023 (Special Report NSF 23-315). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd

___. (2023b). Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering: Fall 2021. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23312

___. (2023c). Table 318.45. Number and percentage distribution of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees/certificates conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, level of degree/certificate, and sex of student: Academic years 2012-13 through 2021-22. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_318.45.asp

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

National Institute on Scientific Teaching. (n.d.). https://www.nisthub.org/

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853

___. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9847

___. (2003). BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10497

___. (2012a). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

___. (2012b). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362

___. (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687

National Science Foundation Act of 1950, Pub. L. No. 81-507, 64 Stat. 149 (1950).

___. (2023). NSF’s NCSES releases report on diversity trends in STEM workforce and education. https://new.nsf.gov/news/diversity-and-stem-2023

National Science Foundation, & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019 (Special Report NSF 19-304). National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2023). Transfer and progress. https://nscresearchcenter.org/transfer-and-progress/

___. (2024). Current term enrollment estimates: Spring 2024. https://nscresearchcenter.org/current-term-enrollment-estimates/

Neiles, K. Y., & Arnett, K. (2021). Backward design of chemistry laboratories: A primer. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2829–2839. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00443

Neisler, J., & Means, B. (2021). Teaching practices of faculty adopting adaptive courseware. Digital Promise Global.

Nespor, J. (2012). Making lectures visible: Redesigning in nutrition. In Technology and the Politics of Instruction (pp. 94–106). Routledge.

Newell, M. J., & Ulrich, P. N. (2022). Gains in scientific identity, scientific self-efficacy, and career intent distinguish upper-level CUREs from traditional experiences in the classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(3), e00051–e00022. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00051-22

Ngai, C., Corbo, J. C., Falkenberg, K. L., Geanious, C., Pawlak, A., Pilgrim, M. E. Quan, G. M., Reinholz, D. L., Smith, C., & Wise, S. B. (2020). Facilitating change in higher education: The Departmental Action Team Model. Glitter Canyon Press.

Nguyen, A., & Lewis, C. M. (2020, February). Competitive enrollment policies in computing departments negatively predict first-year students’ sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and perception of department. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 685–691).

Nicole, D., & Selvaretnam, G. (2021). Making internal feedback explicit: Harnessing the comparisons students make during two-stage exams. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1934653

Nilson, L. B. (2015). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Nilson, L. B., & Stanny, C. J. (2023). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Routledge.

Nix, S., & Perez-Felkner, L. (2019). Difficulty orientations, gender, and race/ethnicity: An intersectional analysis of pathways to STEM degrees. Social Sciences, 8(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020043

Noell, S. L., Rios Buza, M., Roth, E. B., Young, J. L., & Drummond, M. J. (2023). A bridge to specifications grading in second semester general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(6), 2159–2165.

Norman, J. B., Fuesting, M. A., Geerling, D. M., Chen, J. M., Gable, S. L., & Diekman, A. B. (2022). To pursue or not to pursue STEM? Faculty behavior enhances student involvement in STEM roles by signaling role-specific support. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 583–594.

Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching blending active learning with web technology.

Nowell, L., Ovie, G., Berenson, C., Kenny, N., & Hayden, K. A. (2018). Professional learning and development of postdoctoral scholars: A systematic review of the literature. Education Research International, 2018, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5950739

O’Connell, K., Hoke, K., Berkowitz, A., Branchaw, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2021). Undergraduate learning in the field: Designing experiences, assessing outcomes, and exploring future opportunities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1779567

O’Connell, K., Hoke, K. L., Giamellaro, M., Berkowitz, A. R., & Branchaw, J. (2022). A tool for designing and studying student-centered undergraduate field experiences: The UFERN model. BioScience, 72(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab112

O’Donnell, C. T., & Blankenship, C. (2018). Status frustration among college students: The relationship between socioeconomic status and undergraduate performance. Deviant Behavior, 39(6), 679–693.

Odom, S., Bosso, H., Bowling, S., Brownell, S., Cotner, S., Creech, C., Drake, A. G., Eddy, S., Fagbodun, S., Hebert, S., James, A. C., Just, J., Juliana, J. R., Shuster, M., Thompson, S. K., Whittington, R., Wills, B. D., Wilson, A. E., Zamudio, K. R., Zhong, M., & Ballen, C. J. (2021). Meta-analysis of gender performance gaps in undergraduate natural science courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-11-0260

Oh, H. (2020). Academic help seeking of undergraduate STEM students: A basic psychological needs theory perspective [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University].

O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7

Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68, 29–45.

O’Meara, K., Templeton, L. L., White-Lewis, D. K., Culpepper, D., & Anderson, J. (2023). The safest bet: Identifying and assessing risk in faculty selection. American Educational Research Journal, 60(2), 330–366. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221150438

O’Neill, T., Finau-Faumuina, B. M., & Ford, T. U. L. (2023). Toward decolonizing STEM: Centering place and sense of place for community-based problem-solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(8), 1755–1785. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21858

Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100838.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). An OECD Learning Framework 2030. The Future of Education and Labor, 23–35.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Orndorf, H. C., Waterman, M., Lange, D., Kavin, D., Johnston, S. C., & Jenkins, K. P. (2022). Opening the pathway: An example of universal design for learning as a guide to inclusive teaching practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-09-0239

Ortiz-Rodríguez, J. C., Brinkman, H., Nglankong, L., Enderle, B., & Velázquez, J. M. (2021). Promoting inclusive and culturally responsive teaching using co-classes for general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00339

Ortquist-Ahrens, L., & Torosyan, R. (2009). The role of the facilitator in faculty learning communities: Paving the way for growth, productivity, and collegiality. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1).

O’Sullivan, P., Voegele, D. C. J., Buchan, T., Dottin, R., Goin Kono, K., Hamideh, M., Howard, W., Todd, J., Kruse, S., de Gruyter, J., & Berg, K. (2020). Adaptive courseware implementation: Investigating alignment, course redesign, and the student experience. Curriculum and Instruction Faculty Publications and Presentations, 74. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/ci_fac/74/

Osler, J. E., & Mansaray, M. (2014). A model for determining teaching efficacy through the use of qualitative single subject design, student learning outcomes and associative statistics. Journal on School Educational Technology, 10(1), 22–35.

Overall, J. U., & Marsh, H. W. (1979). Midterm feedback from students: Its relationship to instructional improvement and students’ cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(6), 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.6.856

Packard, B. W. L., Gagnon, J. L., LaBello, O., Jeffers, K., & Lynn, E. (2011). Women’s experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2011002470

Packard, B. W. L., Gagnon, J. L., & Senas, A. J. (2012). Navigating community college transfer in science, technical, engineering, and mathematics fields. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(9), 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2010.495570

Page-Reeves, J., Marin, A., Moffett, M., DeerInWater, K., & Medin, D. (2019). Wayfinding as a concept for understanding success among Native Americans in STEM: “Learning how to map through life.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9849-6

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.

Palmer, M. S., Bach, D. J., & Streifer, A. C. (2014). Measuring the promise: A learning-focused syllabus rubric. To Improve the Academy, 33(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20004

Palmer, M. S., Gravett, E. O., & LaFleur, J. (2018). Measuring transparency: A learning-focused assignment rubric. To Improve the Academy, 37(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20083

Palmer, M. S., Wheeler, L. B., & Aneece, I. (2016). Does the document matter? The evolving role of syllabi in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(4), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2016.1198186

Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Thompson, T. (2010). Theory meets practice: HBCU initiatives that promote academic success among African Americans in STEM. Journal of College Student Development, 51(4), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0146

Palmer, R. T., Maramba, D. C., & Gasman, M. (Eds.). (2013). Fostering success of ethnic and racial minorities in STEM: The role of minority serving institutions. Routledge.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Park, E. S., Ngo, F., & Melguizo, T. (2021). The role of math misalignment in the community college STEM pathway. Research in Higher Education, 62(4), 403–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09602-y

Park, S., Hironaka, S., Carver, P., & Nordstrum, L. (2013). Continuous improvement in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/carnegie-foundation_continuous-improve-ment_2013.05.pdf

Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84.

Partridge, M. A., Schaller, T. K., Berry, R. L., & Routon, P. W. (2021). The economic benefit from tuition savings for dual enrollment students in Georgia. Journal of School Choice, 15(4), 655–667.

Peck, F. (2020). Towards anti-deficit education in undergraduate mathematics education: How deficit perspectives work to structure inequality and what can be done about it. PRIMUS, 31(9), 940–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1781721

Peffer, M. E., & Ramezani, N. (2019). Assessing epistemological beliefs of experts and novices via practices in authentic science inquiry. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 3, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0157-9

Pensky, J., Richardson, C., Serrano, A., Gorski, G., Price, A. N., & Zimmer, M. (2021). Disrupt and demystify the unwritten rules of graduate school. Nature Geoscience, 14(8), 538–539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00799-w

Perea, B. (2020). Using smaller credentials to build flexible degree completion and career pathways. In N. Maxwell & S. Gallagher (Eds.), New directions for community colleges, (Vol. 189, pp. 23–37). Wiley.

Perez, C., & Verdin, D. (2022, August). Mastery learning in undergraduate engineering courses: A systematic review. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Pérez, L. F., & Johnston, S. C. (2023). [Creating disability-friendly and inclusive accessible spaces in higher education]. Commissioned paper prepared for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Committee on Beyond Compliance: Promoting the Success of People with Disabilities in the STEM Workforce. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/27245/Johnston_and_Perez_Creating_Disability-Friendly_and_Inclusive_Accessible_Spaces_in_Higher_Education.pdf

Perez, R. J., Motshubi, R., & Rodriguez, S. L. (2023). (Mis)alignment of challenges and strategies in promoting inclusive racial climates in STEM graduate departments. AERA Open, 9, 23328584231168639.

Petcovic, H. L., Stokes, A., & Caulkins, J. L. (2014). Geoscientists’ perceptions of the value of undergraduate field education. GSA Today, 24(7), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG196A.1

Petersen, C. I., Baepler, P., Beitz, A., Ching, P., Gorman, K. S., Neudauer, C. L., Rozaitis, W., Walker, J. D., & Wingert, D. (2020). The tyranny of content: “Content coverage” as a barrier to evidence-based teaching approaches and ways to overcome it. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-04-0079

Pfund, C., Miller, S., Brenner, K., Bruns, P., Chang, A., Ebert-May, D., Fagen, A. P., Gentile, A., Gossens, S., Khan, I. M., Labov, J. B., Pribbenow, C. M., Susman M., Tong, L., Wright, R., Yuan, R. T., Wood, W. B., & Handelsman, J. (2009). Summer institute to improve university science teaching. Science, 324(5926), 470–471. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170015

Philip, T. M., & Azevedo, F. S. (2017). Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education, 101(4), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21286

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530

Picard, R. W., Papert, S., Bender, W., Blumberg, B., Breazeal, C., Cavallo, D., Machover, D., Resnick, M., Roy, D., & Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective learning—A manifesto. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 253–269.

Pietri, E. S., Drawbaugh, M. L., Lewis, A. N., & Johnson, I. R. (2019). Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827

Piloto, C. (2023, March 13). The gender gap in STEM: Still gaping in 2023. MIT Professional Education. https://professionalprograms.mit.edu/blog/leadership/the-gender-gap-in-stem/

POD Network. (n.d.). Occasional report. Defining what matters: Guidelines for comprehensive Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) evaluation. https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/POD_CTL_Evaluation_Guidelines__2018_.pdf

Poole, J. L., & Germain, L. J. (2022). Tool 4: Beyond Title IX—pursuing full participation through Plan, Do Study, Act (PDSA). In Leadership at the intersection of gender and race in healthcare and science (pp. 226–241). Routledge.

Portner, H. (2005). Teacher mentoring and induction: The state of the art and beyond. Corwin Press.

Posselt, J., Hernandez, T. E., Villarreal, C. D., Rodgers, A. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2020). Evaluation and decision making in higher education: Toward equitable repertoires of faculty practice. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–63).

Posselt, J. R., & Nuñez, A.-M. (2022). Learning in the wild: Fieldwork, gender, and the social construction of disciplinary culture. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(2), 163–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1971505

Postsecondary National Policy Institute. (2024). Tribal Colleges and Universities. https://pnpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/TCU_FactSheet_May24.pdf

Prince, M., Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2020). Active student engagement in online STEM classes: Approaches and recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(4), 1–25.

Psaromiligkos, Y., Orfanidou, M., Kytagias, C., & Zafiri, E. (2011). Mining log data for the analysis of learners’ behaviour in web-based learning management systems. Operational Research, 11, 187–200.

Pullias Center for Higher Education. (n.d.). The Delphi Project on the changing faculty and student success. https://pullias.usc.edu/project/the-delphi-project-on-the-changing-faculty-and-student-success/

Qaqish, O., Grant, C. S., & Bowles, T. (2020). Success factors that shape Black male transfer and academic experiences in engineering. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(10–12), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1771628

Queiruga-Dios, M., Santos Sánchez, M. J., Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., Acosta Castellanos, P. M., & Queiruga-Dios, A. (2021). Assessment methods for service-learning projects in engineering in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 629231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629231

Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858090001500200

Rabelo, A., Rodrigues, M. W., Nobre, C., Isotani, S., & Zárate, L. (2024). Educational data mining and learning analytics: A review of educational management in e-learning. Information Discovery and Delivery, 52(2), 149–163.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Rademacher, L., Burmeister, K. C., Ryker, K., Atchison, C. L., Egger, A. E., Shipley, T. F., & Tikoff, B. (2021). The lasting impacts of the COVID pandemic on teaching and learning without the field. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, USA. https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2021AM-368918

Rader, E., Love, R., Reano, D., Dousay, T. A., & Wingerter, N. (2021). Pandemic Minecrafting: An analysis of the perceptions of and lessons learned from a gamified virtual geology field camp. Geoscience Communication, 4(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-475-2021

Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6

___. (2019). A descriptive study of race and gender differences in how instructional style and perceived professor care influence decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0159-2

Ralph, V. R., Scharlott, L. J., Schafer, A. G. L., Deshaye, M. Y., Becker, N. M., & Stowe, R. L. (2022). Advancing equity in STEM: The impact assessment design has on who succeeds in undergraduate introductory chemistry. JACS Au, 2(8), 1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00221

Ramos, H. V., Cobian, K. P., Srinivasan, J., Christie, C. A., Crespi, C. M., & Seeman, T. (2024). Investigating the relationship between participation in the building infrastructure leading to diversity (BUILD) initiative and intent to pursue a science career: A cross-sectional analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102, 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102380

Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6

Ream, R. K., Lewis, J. L., Echeverria, B., & Page, R. N. (2014). Trust matters: Distinction and diversity in undergraduate science education. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–50.

Reed, A. (2023). Micro-credentials and the role of evidence: Increasing the potential for learner-centeredness, inclusivity and an expansive model of assessment and credentialing. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(5), 401–412.

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 355 (1973), codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.

Rehrey, G., Shepard, L., Hostetter, C., Reynolds, A., & Groth, D. (2019). Engaging faculty in learning analytics: Agents of institutional culture change. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 86–94.

Reinholz, D. L. (2023). Equitable and engaging mathematics teaching: A guide to disrupting hierarchies in the classroom. Mathematical Association of America Press.

Reinholz, D. L., Ngai, C., Quan, G., Pilgrim, M. E., Corbo, J. C., & Finkelstein, N. (2019). Fostering sustainable improvements in science education: An analysis through four frames. Science Education, 103(5), 1125–1150.

Reinholz, D. L., Pilgrim, M. E., Stone-Johnstone, A., Falkenberg, K., Geanious, C., Ngai, C., & Corbo, J. C. & Wise, S. B. (2021a). Focus on outcomes: Fostering systemic departmental improvements. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.154

Reinholz, D. L., Ridgway, S., Sukumar, P. T., & Shah, N. (2023). Visualizing inequity: How STEM educators interpret data visualizations to make judgments about racial inequity. SN Social Sciences, 3, Article 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00664-0

Reinholz, D. L., Stone-Johnstone, A., & Shah, N. (2020). Walking the walk: Using classroom analytics to support instructors to address implicit bias in teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1692211

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Reinholz, D. L., White, I., & Andrews, T. (2021b). Change theory in STEM higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00291-2

Renaissance. (n.d.). Student agency. https://www.renaissance.com/edword/student-agency/

Rendon, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33–51.

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning. Cambridge University Press.

Reynolds, H. L., & Kearns, K. D. (2017). A planning tool for incorporating backward design, active learning, and authentic assessment in the college classroom. College Teaching, 65(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1222575

Reynolds, J., & Cruise, S. (2020). Factors that influence persistence among undergraduate students: An analysis of the impact of socioeconomic status and first-generation students. Interchange, 51(2), 199–206.

Riegle-Crumb, C. (2006). The path through math: Course sequences and academic performance at the intersection of race-ethnicity and gender. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1086/506495

Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., & Irizarry, Y. (2019). Does STEM stand out? Examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19831006

Riihimaki, C. A., & Viskupic, K. (2019). Motivators and inhibitors to change: Why and how geoscience faculty modify their course content and teaching methods. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1628590

Rincón, B. E., Fernández, É., & Dueñas, M. C. (2020). Anchoring comunidad: How first-and continuing-generation Latinx students in STEM engage community cultural wealth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(8), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1735567

Roberts, M. T. (2016). Syllabus review guide. Center for Urban Education, University of Southern California. https://cue-equitytools.usc.edu/

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., & Wendt, J. L. (2020). The benefits and challenges of a blended peer mentoring program for women peer mentors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2020-0011

Rodríguez, G., Díez, J., Pérez, N., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019b). Flipped classroom: Fostering creative skills in undergraduate students of health sciences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100575.

Rodriguez, S. L., & Blaney, J. M. (2021). “We’re the unicorns in STEM”: Understanding how academic and social experiences influence sense of belonging for Latina undergraduate students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000176

Rodriguez, S. L., Cunningham, K., & Jordan, A. (2017). What a scientist looks like: How community colleges can utilize and enhance science identity development as a means to improve success for women of color. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(4–5), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1251354

Rodriguez, S. L., Hensen, K. A., & Espino, M. L. (2019a). Promoting STEM identity development in community colleges & across the transfer process. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 26(2), 11–22.

Rodriguez, S. L., Perez, R. J., & Schulz, J. M. (2022). How STEM lab settings influence graduate school socialization and climate for students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000361

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Rogers, K., Galvin, T., & Yee, S. P. (2022, February). Active-learning strategies that suggest ingresses for math graduate student instructors’ use of student-centered teaching. Conference Proceedings in the 24th annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Boston, MA, USA.

Rogers, K. C., & Steele, M. D. (2016). Graduate teaching assistants’ enactment of reasoning- and-proving tasks in a content course for elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(4), 372–419.

Ross, M., Capobianco, B. M., & Godwin, A. (2017). Repositioning race, gender, and role identity formation for Black women in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017016424

Rossouw, N., & Frick, L. (2023). A conceptual framework for uncovering the hidden curriculum in private education. Cogent Education, 10, Article 2191409. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2191409

RTI International. (2023). First-generation college students in 2020: Demographic characteristics and postsecondary enrollment. https://firstgen.naspa.org/files/dmfile/15405_NASPA_FactSheet-01.pdf

Ruder, S., Brown, P. J., & Stanford, C. (2020). Developing POGIL materials: Writing and refining activities for a spectrum of content areas. Journal on Excellence on College Teaching, 31(1), 189–228.

Rudolph, F. (2021). The American college and university: A history. Plunkett Lake Press.

Rush, B. (2023). Disabilities in higher education: The impact of the disability resource center at Mississippi State University. [Doctoral dissertation, 5974, Mississippi State University]. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/5974

Russel, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Lemahiue, P. G., & Grunow, A. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–36. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016146811711900501

Rutschow, E. Z., Sepanik, S., Deitch, V., Raufman, J., Dukes, D. C., & Moussa, A. (2019). Gaining ground: Findings from the Dana Center Mathematics Pathways Impact Study. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/d8-bhz4-4112

Ryan, R. M. (Ed.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of human motivation. Oxford University Press USA.

Rybarczyk, B., Lerea, L. Lund, P. K, Whittington, D., & Dykstra, L. (2011). Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate. BioScience, 61(9), 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.8

Saetermoe, C. L., Chavira, G., Khachikian, C. S., Boyns, D., & Cabello, B. (2017, December). Critical race theory as a bridge in science training: The California State University, Northridge BUILD PODER program. In BMC Proceedings (Vol. 11, pp. 41–55). BioMed Central.

Saitta, E., & Donnelly, J. (2022). The role and influence of the discipline-based education research (DBER) community on stem faculty development. In S. M. Linder, C. M. Lee, S. K. Stefl, & K. A. High (Eds.), Handbook of STEM faculty development (pp. 61–70). Information Age Publishing.

Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Rodríguez-Díez, J. J., Díez-Pastor, J. F., Rodríguez-Arribas, S., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., & Ji, Y. P. (2021). Monitoring of student learning in learning management systems: An application of educational data mining techniques. Applied Sciences, 11(6), 2677.

Salam, M., Awang Iskander, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 573–593.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Salehi, S., Berk, S. A., Brunelli, R., Cotner, S., Creech, C., Drake, A. G., Fagbodun, S., Hall, C., Hebert, S., Hewlett, J., James, A. C., Shuster, M., St Juliana, J. R., Stovall, D. B., Whittington, R., Zhong, M., & Ballen, C. J. (2021). Context matters: Social psychological factors that underlie academic performance across seven institutions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(4), Article 68. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0012

Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G. P., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019a). Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020114.

Salehi, S., Cotner, S., Azarin, S. M., Carlson, E. E., Driessen, M., Ferry, V. E., Harcombe, W., McGaugh, S., Wassenberg, D., Yonas, A., & Ballen, C. J. (2019b). Gender performance gaps across different assessment methods and the underlying mechanisms: The case of incoming preparation and test anxiety. Frontiers in Education, 4, 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00107

Sanabria, T., & Penner, A. (2017). Weeded out? Gendered responses to failing calculus. Social Sciences, 6(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047

Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Stevens, R. H. (2011). Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. Internation Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 323–340.

Santangelo, J., Cadieux, M., & Zapata, S. (2021a). Developing student metacognitive skills using active learning with embedded metacognition instruction. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 22(2).

Santangelo, J., Hobbie, L., Lee, J., Pullin, M., Villa-Cuesta, E., & Hyslop, A. (2021b). The (STEM)2 Network: A multi-institution, multidisciplinary approach to transforming undergraduate STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 3, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00262-z

Sathianathan, D. (1997, November). Faculty collaboration and course coordination in geographically dispersed campuses. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference: Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change (Vol. 1, pp. 34–37). IEEE.

Sathy, V., & Moore, Q. (2020). Who benefits from the flipped classroom?: Quasi-experimental findings on student learning, engagement, course perceptions, and interest in statistics. In Teaching statistics and quantitative methods in the 21st century (pp. 197–216). Routledge.

Savaria, M. C., & Monteiro, K. A. (2017). A critical discourse analysis of engineering course syllabi and recommendations for increasing engagement among women in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(1).

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Schaller, T. K., Routon, P. W., Partridge, M. A., & Berry, R. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of dual enrollment research. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15210251231170331.

Schinske, J., & Tanner, K. (2014). Teaching more by grading less (or differently). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054

Schinske, J. N., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., & Wyer, M. (2016). Scientist spotlight homework assignments shift students’ stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0002

Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Schmidt, E., Vik, R., Brubaker, B. W., Abdulahad, S. S., Soto-Olson, D. K., Monjure, T. A., Battle, C. H., & Jayarickramaraja, J. (2020). Increasing student interest and self-efficacy in STEM by offering a service-learning chemistry course in New Orleans. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(11), 4008–4018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01140

Schneider, J., & Hutt, E. (2013). Making the grade: A history of the A-F marking scheme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.790480

Schreffler, J., Vasquez, E., III, Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–10.

Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173–208.

Schwab, K., Moseley, B., & Dustin, D. (2018). Grading grades as a measure of student learning. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 33(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2018.1513276

Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.

Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1.

Scileppi, J. A. (1988). A systems view of education: A model for change. University Press of America.

Scott Coker, J. (2017). Student-designed experiments: A pedagogical design for introductory science labs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 14–19.

Seagren, A. T., Creswell, J. W., & Wheeler, D. W. (1993). The department chair: New roles, responsibilities, and challenges. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5

Sellers, V. B., & Villanueva, I. (2021). What strategies do diverse women in engineering use to cope with situational hidden curriculum? [Virtual conference session]. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--38051

Senior, R. M., Bartholomew, P., Soor, A., Shepperd, D., Bartholomew, N., & Senior, C. (2018). “The rules of engagement”: Student engagement and motivation to improve the quality of undergraduate learning. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00032

Seok, S., DaCosta, B., & Hodges, R. (2018). A systematic review of empirically based universal design for learning: Implementation and effectiveness of universal design in education for students with and without disabilities at the postsecondary level. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(05), 171.

Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, Pub. L. No. 78-346, 58 Stat. 284 (1944), codified as amended at 38 U.S.C. § 2001 et seq.

Settles, I. H., Jones, M. K., Buchanan, N. T., & Dotson, K. (2021). Epistemic exclusion: Scholar (ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000174

Sexton, M. W., & Sharma, V. (2021). Building equitable research experiences at a two-year community college. Perspectives on Undergraduate Research & Mentoring, 10(1). https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/undergraduate-research/purm/purm-10-1/

Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Seymour, E., & A. -B. Hunter (Eds.). (2019). Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 197–243). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7

Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-0

Shafer, G. W., Viskupic, K., & Egger, A. E. (2023). Critical workforce skills for bachelor-level geoscientists: An analysis of geoscience job advertisements. Geosphere, 19(2), 628–644. https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02581.1

Shakman, K., Wogan, D., Rodriguez, S., Boyce, J., & Shaver, D. (2020). Continuous improvement in education: A toolkit for schools and districts (REL 2021-014). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Shapiro, D. T., & Tang, Z. (2019). The national student clearinghouse: Leveraging administrative data for postsecondary improvement. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2019(181), 117–131.

Sherman, D. K., Hartson, K. A., Binning, K. R., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., Taborsky-Barba, S., Tomassetti, S., Nussbaum, A. D., & Cohen, G. L. (2013). Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: How self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 591–618. https://doi.org/10/1037/a0031495

Sherman, D. K., Lokhande, M., Müller, T., & Cohen, G. L. (2021) Self-affirmation interventions. In G. M. Walton & A. J. Crum (Eds.). Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 63–99). Guilford Press.

Shortlidge, E. E., & Eddy, S. L. (2018). The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576

Shukla, S. Y., Theobald, E. J., Abraham, J. K., & Price, R. M. (2022). Reframing educational outcomes: Moving beyond achievement gaps. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), es2. https://doi/org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0130

Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–26). Macmillan.

Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2022). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 31–54.

Simpson, A., & Bouhafa, Y. (2020). Youths’ and adults’ identity in STEM: A systemic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(9), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y

Singer, A., Montgomery, G., & Schmoll, S. (2020). How to foster the formation of STEM identity: Studying diversity in an authentic learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–12.

Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2015). Continuous improvement philosophy—literature review and directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(1), 75–119.

Slattery, J. M., & Carlson, J. F. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practices. College Teaching, 53(4), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164

Slim, A., Kozlick, J., Heileman, G. L., & Abdallah, C. T. (2014, July). The complexity of university curricula according to course cruciality. In Proceedings—2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2014 (pp. 242–248). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2014.34

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., & Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Vanderbilt University Press.

Smith, K. A. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making “groupwork” work. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty (pp. 71–82). Jossey-Bass.

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury.

Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165919

Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Alfred A. Knopf.

Solanki, S., McPartlan, P., Xu, D., & Sato, B. K. (2019). Success with EASE: Who benefits from STEM learning community? PLoS One, 14(3), e0213827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213827

Soliz, A. (2023). Career and technical education at community colleges: A review of the literature. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231186618

Solyom, J. A., Chin, J., McKinley Jones Brayboy, B., Poleviyuma, A., Abuwandi, S., Richmond, A., Tachine, A., Ben, C., & Bang, M. (2019). Systems of support: What institutions of higher education can do for Indigenous communities.

Sorcinelli, M. D. (2002). Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. In A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 9–23).

Speer, N., Gutmann, T., & Murphy, T. J. (2005). Mathematics teaching assistant preparation and development. College Teaching, 53(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.2.75-80

Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235

Spoon, K., LaBerge, N., Wapman, K. H., Zhang, S., Morgan, A. C., Galesic, M., Fosdick, B. K., Larremore, D. B., & Clauset, A. (2023). Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty. Science Advances, 9(42). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi2205

Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870

Spurlin, J., Rajala, S. A., & Lavelle, J. P. (Eds.). (2008). Designing better engineering education through assessment: A practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and ABET criteria to improve student learning. Routledge.

St. John, K., & McNeal, K. S. (2017). The strength of evidence pyramid: One approach for characterizing the strength of evidence of Geoscience Education Research (GER) community claims. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-264.1

Stack Hankey, M., Burge, P. L., Knight, D. B., Seidel, R. W., & Skaggs, G. (2019). Community college engineering students’ perceptions of classroom climate and fundamental engineering skills. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(7), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1494063

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., Rodela, T. M., Sanders, E. R., Schimpf, N. G., Schulte, P. M., Smith, M. K., Stetzer, M., Van Valkenburgh, B., Vinson, E., Weir, L. K., Wendel, P. J., Wheeler, L. B., & Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892

Stanberry, M. L., & Payne, W. R. (2018). Active learning in undergraduate STEM education: A review of research. In M. Shelley & S. A. Kiray (Eds.), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 147–146). ISRES Publishing.

Stanich, C. A., Pelch, M. A., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2018). A new approach to supplementary instruction narrows achievement and affect gaps for underrepresented minorities, first-generation students, and women. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00044A

Stanton, J. D., Dye, K. M., & Johnson, M. S. (2019). Knowledge of learning makes a difference: A comparison of metacognition in introductory and senior-level biology students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0239

Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

Starobin, S. S., & Laanan, F. S. (2008). Broadening female participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Experiences at community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008(142), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.323

Starobin, S. S., Smith, D. J., & Santos Laanan, F. (2016). Deconstructing the transfer student capital: Intersect between social and cultural capital among female transfer students in STEM fields. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(12), 1040–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1204964

Starr, C. R., Hunter, L., Dunkin, R., Honig, S., Palomino, R., & Leaper, C. (2020). Engaging in science practices in classrooms predicts increases in undergraduates’ STEM motivation, identity, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1093–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21623

State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO). (2021, May 18). New analysis finds that you get what you pay for: State higher education funding directly impacts student success. https://sheeo.org/new-analysis-finds-that-you-get-what-you-pay-for-statehigher-education-funding-directly-impacts-student-success/

___. (2022). State effort and capacity to fund higher education: FY 2019 and 2020. https://shef.sheeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SHEEO_SHEF_FY20_State_Effort_Report.pdf

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes affect intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0

Steele-Johnson, D., & Leas, K. (2013). Importance of race, gender, and personality in predicting academic performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1736–1744.

Steer, D., Iverson, E. R., Egger, A. E., Kastens, K. A., Manduca, C. A., & McConnell, D. (2019). The InTeGrate materials development rubric: A framework and process for developing curricular materials that meet ambitious goals. In D. Sosselin, A. Egger, & J. Taber (Eds.), Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future (pp. 25–43). AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03273-9_2

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Stein, W. J. (1999). Tribal colleges: 1968–1998. In K. C. Swisher & J. W. Tippeconnic III (Eds.), Next steps: Research and practice to advance Indian education (pp. 259–270). Appalachia Educational Laboratory.

Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2021). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874

Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubius, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143

Stephens-Martinez, K., & Railling, B. (2019, February). How can we make office hours better? In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1247–1247). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3293741

Stevens, M. L., Armstrong, E. A., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127–151.

Stewart-Rozema, J. & Pratts, C. (2023, December 18). International student enrollment statistics. BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/international-studentenrollment-statistics/

Stokes, A., & Boyle, A. P. (2009). The undergraduate geoscience fieldwork experience: Influencing factors and implications for learning. In S. J. Whitmeyer, D. W. Mogk, & E. J. Pyle (Eds.), Field geology education: Historical perspectives and modern approaches (pp. 291–311). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2009.2461(23)

Stokes, A., Feig, A. D., Atchison, C. L., & Gilley, B. (2019). Making geoscience fieldwork inclusive and accessible for students with disabilities. Geosphere, 15(6), 1809–1825. https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02006.1

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.

Stommel, J. (2024). Ungrading: An introduction. Pedagogy, 24(3), 327–340.

Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385

Stratton, T. D., & Elam, C. L. (2014). A holistic review of the medical school admission process: Examining correlates of academic underperformance. Medical Education Online, 19(1), 22919.

Strayhorn, T. L. (2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.

Strayhorn, T. L., Williams, M. S., Tillman-Kelly, D. L., & Dorimé-Williams, M. (2013). STEMming the tide: Psychological factors influencing racial and ethnic minority students’ success in STEM at community colleges. In R. T. Palmer & J. L. Wood (Eds.), Community colleges and STEM: Examining underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities (pp. 91–100). Routledge.

Strohl, J., Nyhof, E., & Morris, C. (2024). Progress interrupted: Evaluating a decade of demographic change at selective and open-access institutions prior to the end of race-conscious affirmative action. Center on Education and the Workforce, Georgetown University. https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/progressinterrupted/

Student Experience Project.(2022a, July 13). Community of practice handbook. https://studentexperienceproject.org/handbook/

___. (2022b). Increasing equity in college student experience: Findings from a national collaborative. https://s45004.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Increasing-Equity-in-Student-Experience-Findings-from-a-National-Collaborative.pdf

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Swing, R. L., Jones, D., & Ross, L. E. (2016). The AIR National Survey of Institutional Research Offices. Association for Institutional Research. http://www.airweb.org/nationalsurvey.

Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.635987

Talbot, R. M., Hartley, L., Marzetta, K., & S. Wee, B. (2015). Transforming undergraduate science education with learning assistants: Student satisfaction in large-enrollment courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(5), 24–30.

Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022

Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2007). Cultural competence in the college biology classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-09-0086

Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120.

Tatapudy, S., Potter, R., Bostrom, L., Colgan, A., Self, C. J., Smith, J., Xu, S., & Theobald, E. J. (2024). Visualizing inequities: A step toward equitable student outcomes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(4), es9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0086

Taylor, D. G., & Frechette, M. (2022). The impact of workload, productivity, and social support on burnout among marketing faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Marketing Education, 44(2), 134–148.

Taylor, J. L., & Jain, D. (2017). The multiple dimensions of transfer: Examining the transfer function in American higher education. Community College Review, 45(4), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552117725177

Taylor, L. D., Jr. (2020). Neoliberal consequence: Data-driven decision making and the subversion of student success efforts. The Review of Higher Education, 43(4), 1069–1097. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0031

Teasdale, R., Ryker, K., & Bitting, K. (2019). Training graduate teaching assistants in the geosciences: Our practices vs. perceived needs. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1542476

Temponi, C. (2005). Continuous improvement framework: Implications for academia. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1), 17–36.

Teshera-Levye, J., Atchison, T., Callis-Duehl, K., Gould, T., Lichti, D., Scemama, J. L., & VanceChalcraft, H. D. (2023). Transfer-bound community college students’ biology identity and perception of teaching. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(3), e00116-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.0016-23

Thacker, I., Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N. T., & Beardsley, P. (2022). Social connectedness in physical isolation: Online teaching practices that support underrepresented undergraduate students’ feelings of belonging and engagement in STEM. Education Sciences, 12(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020061

Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–16.

The First Morrill Act of 1862, 7 U.S.C. 301 et seq. (1862). https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=morrill+act+1862&f=treesort&fq=true&num=0&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title7-section301

The Second Morrill Act of 1890, Pub. L. No. 51-841, 26 Stat. 417 (1890), codified as amended at 7 U.S.C. § 321 et seq. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=second+morrill+act+1890&f=treesort&fq=true&num=0&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title7-section301

Theobald, E. J., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter. PLoS One, 12(7), e0181336.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintron, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., II, Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., Lowe, A., Newman, S., Okolo, V., Olroyd, S., Peecook, B. R., Pickett, S. B., Slager, D. L., Caviedes-Solis, I. W., Stanchak, K. E., Sundaravardan, V., Valdebenito, C., Williams, C. R., Zinsli, K., & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

Thiele, T., Singleton, A., Pope, D., & Stanistreet, D. (2014). Predicting students’ academic performance based on school and socio-demographic characteristics. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1424–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.974528

Thiry, H. (2019a). What enables persistence? In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 399–436). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_12

Thiry, H. (2019b). Issues with high school preparation and transition to college. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 137–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_5

Thiry, H., & Laursen, S. L. (2011). The role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers into a scientific community of practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9271-2

Thiry, H., & Weston, T. J. (2019). Choosing STEM majors. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 115–136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_5

Thiry, H., Zahner, D. H., Weston, T., Harper, R., & Loshbaugh, H. (2023). How can universities support STEM transfer students? A framework for strategic planning and action. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 55(4), 11–22.

Thorp, H., & Goldstein, B. (2018). Our higher calling: Rebuilding the partnership between America and its colleges and universities. The University of North Carolina Press.

Thorp, H., & Goldstein, B. (2024, March 11). With confidence in higher ed plummeting, colleges must recommit to teaching. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/03/11/rebuild-public-confidence-focus-teaching-opinion

Tiede, H. J. (2015). University reform: The founding of the American Association of University Professors. John Hopkins University Press.

Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2018). Institutional culture in higher education. In R. N. Teixeria, J. C. Shin, A. Amaral, E. Balbachevsky, A. Bernasconi, E. Choi, H. De Wit, G. Goatsellec, F. Hunter, B. M. Kehm, M. Klemenčič, P. Langa, A. Magalhâes, G. Mohamedbhai, T. Nokkala, L. Rumbley, B. Stensaker, L. Unangst, J. Valimaa, & R. Yang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–7). Springer.

Tijsma, G., Hilverda, F., Scheffelaar, A., Alders, S., Schoonmade, L., Blignaut, N., & Zweekhorst, M. (2020). Becoming productive 21st century citizens: A systematic review uncovering design principles for integrating community service learning into higher education courses. Educational Research, 62(4), 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. No. 92-318, 86 Stat. 235 (1972), codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.

Toldson, I. A. (2019). Cultivating STEM talent at minority serving institutions: Challenges and opportunities to broaden participation in STEM at historically Black colleges and universities. In L. L. Winfield, G. Thomas, L. M. Watkins, & K. S. Wilson-Kennedy (Eds.), Growing diverse STEM communities: Methodology, impact, and evidence (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1328

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Toledo, S., & Dubias, J. M. (2017). A learner-centered grading method focused on reaching proficiency with course learning outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1043–1050.

Tomasik, J. H., Cottone, K. E., Heethuis, M. T., & Mueller, A. (2013). Development and preliminary impacts of the implementation of an authentic research-based experiment in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1155–1161, https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300328p

Tomkin, J. H., Beilstein, S. O., Morphew, J. W., & Herman, G. L. (2019). Evidence that communities of practice are associated with active learning in large STEM lectures. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0154-z

Tomovic, M. M. (1994). Undergraduate research—prerequisite for successful lifelong learning. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1, 1469–1470

Totonchi, D. A., Perez, T., Lee, Y. K., Robinson, K. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2021). The role of stereotype threat in ethnically minoritized students’ science motivation: A four-year longitudinal study of achievement and persistence in STEM. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, Article 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102015

Towns, M. H. (2010). Developing learning objectives and assessment plans at a variety of institutions: Examples and case studies. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed8000039

Townsley, M., & Schmid, D. (2020). Alternative grading practices: An entry point for faculty in competency-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 5(3), e01219. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1219

Transforming Higher Education Multidimensional Evaluation of Teaching. (n.d.). Tools for evaluation. https://teval.net/?tools_for_evaluation

Traweek, S. (1993). An introduction to cultural and social studies of sciences and technologies. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 17, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01380596

Tripp, B., Cozzens, S., Hrycyk, C., Tanner, K. D., & Schinske, J. N. (2024). Content coverage as persistent exclusionary practice: Investigating perspectives of health professionals on the influence of undergraduate coursework. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(1), Article 5.

Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241

Tsoi, M. Y., Anzovino, M. E., Erickson, A. H., Forringer, E. R., Henary, E., Lively, A., Morton, M. S., Perell-Gerson, K. L., Perrine, S., Villanueva, O., Whitney, M., & Woodbridge, C. M. (2019). Variations in implementation of specifications grading in STEM courses. Georgia Journal of Science, 77(2), Article 10. https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol77/iss2/10

Turner, N., & Farooqi, M. (2017). Campus climate survey paints grim picture of students’ emotional safety, sense of belonging at American University. The Eagle. https://www.theeagleonline.com/article/2017/10/american-university-campus-climate-survey-shows-lack-of-emotional-safety-sense-of-belonging-among-students-of-color

Turner, S., & Bound, J. (2002). Closing the gap or widening the divide: The effects of the GI Bill and World War II on the educational outcomes of black Americans. The Journal of Economic History, 63(1), 145–177.

Turochy E., Ballesteros, L., Nelson, T. N. T., Perez, M., Estes, K., Poleacovschi, C., Doran, E., & Yuen, T. (2023). Stereotypes and stereotype threats experienced by Latinx undergraduate engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 1181–1195.

Tuthill, M. C., & Berestecky, J. M. (2017). Integrating undergraduate research at two-year colleges. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_04_12

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Twombly, S., & Townsend, B. K. (2008). Community college faculty what we know and need to know. Community College Review, 36(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108319538

University of California, Davis. (n.d.). Know your students. https://cee.ucdavis.edu/know-your-students

University of California, Santa Barbara. (n.d.). Data dashboards. https://otl.ucsb.edu/data-dashboards

University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (n.d.). Course insights. https://analytics.unl.edu/

University System of Georgia. (n.d.). Board of regents policy manual: 3.3 curriculum. https://www.usg.edu/policymanual/section3/C338

Upadhyay, B., Atwood, E., & Tharu, B. (2020). Actions for sociopolitical consciousness in a high school science class: A case study of ninth grade class with predominantly indigenous students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21626

Urban Institute. (2024). Student-parent families at the center. https://www.urban.org/projects/student-parent-families-center

U.S. Department of Education (ED). (2023). Upward bound program. https://www.ed.gov/grants-and-programs/grants-higher-education/trio/upward-bound-program

___. (2024a). Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement Program. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/triomcnair/index.html

___. (2024b). TRIO home page. https://www.ed.gov/grants-and-programs/grants-highereducation/trio-home-page

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2024). Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) initiative. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/training/dpc/Pages/build.aspx

Uttamchandani, S. (2018). Equity in the learning sciences: Recent themes and pathways. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 1. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/cscl2018.480

van Barneveld, A., & DeWaard, H. (2021). Preclass surveys to inform course design. In Designing courses with digital technologies (pp. 149–153). Routledge.

Van Dusen, B., Nissen, J., Talbot, R. M., Huvard, H., & Shultz, M. (2021). A QuantCrit investigation of society’s educational debts due to racism and sexism in chemistry student learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 25–34.

Van Noy, M., Trimble, M., Jenkins, D., Barnett, E., & Wachen, J. (2016). Guided pathways to careers: Four dimensions of structure in community college career-technical programs. Community College Review, 44(4), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552116652939

Van Noy, M., & Zeidenberg, M. (2014). [Hidden STEM knowledge producers: Community colleges’ multiple contributions to STEM education and workforce development]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 1- and 4-Year STEM Degrees, National Academy of Sciences.

___. (2017). Community college pathways to STEM workforce: What are they, who follows them, and how? In D. J. Smith & S. Sarobin (Eds.), Preparing a STEM workforce through career-technical education: New directions for community colleges (No. 178, pp. 9–22). Jossey Bass.

Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(3), Article 26.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Vega, Y., & Meaders, C. L. (2023). Have you heard about this? An exploration of instructor communication about campus resources to students in biology courses. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(2), 41–64.

Velasco, T., Fink, J., Bedoya, M., & Jenkins, D. (2024). Tracking transfer four year institutional effectiveness in broadening bachelor’s degree attainment. CCRC. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/tracking-transfer-four-year-institutional-effectiveness.pdf

Vélez-Ibáñez, C. G., & Greenberg, J. B. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S. Mexican households. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1992.23.4.05x1582v

Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive, and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129106

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

Vican, S., Friedman, A., & Andreasen, R. (2020). Metrics, money, and managerialism: Faculty experiences in competing logics in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1615332

Villa, E. Q., Kephart, K., Gates, A. Q., Thiry, H., & Hug, S. (2013). Affinity research groups in practice: Apprenticing students in research. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20016

Villalobos, C., Garza, G., Setayesh, S., Fernandez, L., Balogh, A., Serbin, K. S., & Huber, T. J. (2024). Our never-ending pathway to innovate calculus 1: Course coordination and active learning to specifications grading and growth mindset. PRIMUS, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2024.2352874

Villalobos, C., Kim, H. W., Huber, T. J., Knobel, R., Setayesh, S., Sasidharan, L., Galstyan, A., & Balogh, A. (2021). Coordinating STEM core courses for student success. Primus, 31(3-5), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1793855

Villanueva, I., Gelles, L. A., Di Stefano, M., Smith, B., Tull, R. G., Lord, S. M., Benson, L., Hunt, A. T., Riley, D. M., & Ryan, G. W. (2018). What does hidden curriculum in engineering look like and how can it be explored? Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--31234

Villanueva Alarcón, I., & Muñoz, J. A. (2024). Exploring the hidden realities of Latinx/e contingent faculty in STEM. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(2), 905–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2023.2175683

Vito, M., Ramirez, M., & Gunder, A. (2024). [Bridging innovation and access: Academic innovation to advance student success in undergraduate STEM education]. Commissioned paper prepared for the Committee on Equitable and Effective Teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Framework for Insitutions, Educators, and Disciplines. The National Academies Press.

Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Learning and memory under stress: Implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 1, Article 16011. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11

Voigt, M. (2022). A quantitative exploration of queer-spectrum students’ experiences in introductory undergraduate mathematics courses. PLoS One, 17(10), e0275325.

___. (July 2024). Identifying queer discourses and navigational strategies in mathematics for undergraduate STEM students. Frontiers in Education, 9, p. 1442806.

von Hoene, L. M. (2020). From orientations to outcomes: Articulating a comprehensive and systematic approach to preparing future higher education instructors. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(163), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20406

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2022). Impact of formative assessment instructional approach on students’ mathematics achievement and their metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 119–138.

Walling, C. L. (2023). Bridging the gap for contingent faculty: An analysis of the professional development and growth resources used in public universities across Michigan [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo].

Walton Family Foundation. (2023, December 5). Majority of Gen Z interested in STEM, but schools struggle to provide adequate support. https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/about-us/newsroom/majority-of-gen-z-interested-in-stem-but-schoolsstruggle-to-provide-adequate-support

Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364

Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322

Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., Logel, C., Yeager, D. S., Goyer, J. P., Brady, S. T., Emerson, K. T. U., Paunesku, D., Fotuhi, O., Blodorn, A., Boucher, K. L., Carter, E. R., Gopalan, M., Henderson, A., Kroeper, K. M., Murdock-Perriera, L. A., Reeves, S. L., Ablorh, T. T., Ansari, S., Chen, S., … Krol, N. (2023). Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college? Science, 380(6644), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade4420

Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college. John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885988

Wang, X. (2013a). Baccalaureate expectations of community college students: Socio-demographic, motivational, and contextual influences. Teachers College Record, 115(4), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500402

___. (2013b). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54, 664–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x

___. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714552561

___. (2017). Toward a holistic theoretical model of momentum for community college student success. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 32, pp. 259–308). Springer.

___. (2020). On my own: The challenge and promise of building equitable STEM transfer pathways. Harvard Education Press.

Wang, X., Chan, H. Y., Soffa, S. J., & Nachman, B. R. (2017a). A nuanced look at women in STEM fields at two-year colleges: Factors that shape female students’ transfer intent. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00146

Wang, X., Sun, N., & Wickersham, K. (2017b). Turning math remediation into “homeroom”: Contextualization as a motivational environment for community college students in remedial math. The Review of Higher Education, 40(3), 427–464. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0014

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Wang, X., Wickersham, K., Lee, S. Y., Lor, N. B., Gaskew, A., & Prevost, A. (2020). The road to becoming a scientist: A mixed-methods investigation of supports and barriers experienced by first-year community college students. Teachers College Record, 122(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200208

Wang, Y., Apkarian, N., Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C., Johnson, E., Raker, J. R., & Stains, M. (2024). A national snapshot of introductory chemistry instructors and their instructional practices. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(4), 1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00040

Wapman, K. H., Zhang, S., Clauset, A., & Larremore, D. B. (2022). Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention. Nature, 610, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05222-x

Ward, C., Topham, T., Dixon, H., Peterson, A., Rieder, J., Duffin, B., & Coburn, J. (2024). Culturally inclusive STEM learning: Mentored internships for Native American undergraduates at a tribal college and a university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 17(3), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000413

Watson, C. N., Duran, P., Castillo, A., Fuller, E., Potvin, G., & Kramer, L. (2023). The supportive role of active learning in a calculus course on low precalculus proficiency students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2255189

Weaver, G. C., Austin, A. E., Greenhoot, A. F., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2020). Establishing a better approach for evaluating teaching: The TEval Project. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(3), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2020.1745575

Webb, D. J., & Paul, C. A. (2023). Attributing equity gaps to course structure in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020126

Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330970

Weeden, K. A., Gelbgiser, D., & Morgan, S. L. (2020). Pipeline dreams: Occupational plans and gender differences in STEM major persistence and completion. Sociology of Education, 93(4), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720928484

Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: Alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-03-0028

Wei, X., Christiano, E. R., Yu, J. W., Blackorby, J., Shattuck, P., & Newman, L. A. (2014). Postsecondary pathways and persistence for STEM versus non-STEM majors: Among college students with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1159–1167.

Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R., (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). Academic Press.

Wells, R. S., Chen, L., Bettencourt, G. M., & Haas, S. (2023). Reconsidering rural-nonrural college enrollment gaps: The role of socioeconomic status in geographies of opportunity. Research in Higher Education, 64(8), 1089–1112.

Wells, R. S., Manly, C. A., Kommers, S., & Kimball, E. (2019). Narrowed gaps and persistent challenges: Examining rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary outcomes over time. American Journal of Education, 126(1), 1–31.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Wenger, E., & Nückles, M. (2015). Knowledge acquisition or participation in communities of practice? Academics’ metaphors of teaching and learning at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 624–643.

Werth, A., West, C. G., Lewandowski, H. J. (2022). Impacts on student learning, confidence, and affect in a remote, large-enrollment, course-based undergraduate research experience in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 010129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010129

West, T. M. (2019). A survey of college students with learning disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to identify their relationship and use of college disability resource centers. All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. Utah State University. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/1395

Weston, T. J., Seymour, E., Koch, A. K., & Drake, B. M. (2019). Weed-out classes and their consequences. In E. Seymour & A.-B. Hunter (Eds.), Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education (pp. 197–243). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_7

Wheeler, L. B., & Bach, D. (2021). Understanding the impact of educational development interventions on classroom instruction and student success. International Journal for Academic Development, 26(1), 24–40.

Whitcomb, K. M., Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2021). Not all disadvantages are equal: Racial/ethnic minority students have largest disadvantage among demographic groups in both STEM and non-STEM GPA. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211059824. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23328584211059823

White, J. W., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2011). Minority college students and tacit “codes of power”: Developing academic discourses and identities. Review of Higher Education: Journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, 34(2), 283–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2010.0028

White, K. N., Vincent-Layton, K., & Villarreal, B. (2020). Equitable and inclusive practices designed to reduce equity gaps in undergraduate chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01094

White, M. M., Olson, S. J., & Canning, E. A. (2024). Disentangling the impact of instructor mindset and demeanor on student experiences. Motivation Science.

The White House. (2024, May 16). The economics of HBCUs. https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2024/05/16/the-economics-of-hbcus/#:~:text=Although%20they%20make%20up%20less,degrees%20earned%20by%20Black%20students

Whitehead, A. (2018). Examining influence of family, friends, and educators on first-year college student selection STEM major selection. Journal of Mason Graduate Research, 5(2), 58–84.

Wickersham, K., & Wang, X. (2016). What’s life got to do with it? The role of life experiences in shaping female community college students’ transfer intent in STEM fields of study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(12), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1211039

Wickersham, K. R. (2020). Where to go from here? Toward a model of 2-year college students’ postsecondary pathway selection. Community College Review, 48(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119880941

Wieman, C. (2017). Improving how universities teach science: Lessons from the science education initiative. Harvard University Press.

Wieman, C. E., Rieger, G. W., & Heiner, C. E. (2014). Physics exams that promote collaborative learning. The Physics Teacher, 52(1), 51–53.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Wilder, C. S. (2013). Ebony and ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities. Bloomsbury Press.

Williams, A. (2021). Using an assets-based approach to explore Black women’s pursuit and persistence in undergraduate STEM majors [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University].

Williams, A., & Perry, A. (2020). Prioritizing equity in dual enrollment [Policy brief]. Equitable Transitions through Pandemic Disruptions. Education Commission of the States.

Williams, M., Apkarian, N., Uhing, K., Martinez, A. E., Rasmussen, C., & Smith, W. M. (2022). In the driver’s seat: Course coordinators as change agents for active learning in university Precalculus to Calculus 2. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00153-w

Winget, M., & Persky, A. M. (2022, December) A practical review of mastery learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8906

Wingfield, A. H. (2024). Faculty of color and the changing university. In Conditionally accepted: Navigating higher education from the margins (pp. 165–168). University of Texas Press.

Winkelmes, M.-A. (2019). Introduction: The story of TILT and its emerging uses in higher education. In M.-A. Winkelmes, A. Boye, & S. Tapp, (Eds.), Transparent design in higher education teaching and leadership: A guide to implementing the transparency framework institution-wide to improve learning and retention (pp. 1–14). Stylus Publishing.

Winkelmes, M. A., Boye, A., & Tapp, S. (Eds.). (2019). Transparent design in higher education teaching and leadership: A guide to implementing the transparency framework institution-wide to improve learning and retention. Taylor & Francis.

Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 657–667.

Winter, J., & Cotton, D. (2012). Making the hidden curriculum visible: Sustainability literacy in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 783–796.

Winter, K., Kent, J., & Bradshaw, R. (2018). Preparing future faculty: A framework for program design and evaluation at the university level. Council of Graduate Schools.

Wofford, A. M., & Gutzwa, J. A. (2022). Funds of science identity: Toward an asset-based framework for undergraduate STEM research and praxis. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 28(3), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022036454

Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623520601056240

Wolniak, G. C., & Engberg, M. E. (2019). Do “high-impact” college experiences affect early career outcomes? The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 825–858.

Wolniak, G. C., George, C. E., & Nelson, G. R. (2018). The emerging differential tuition era among US public universities. In Under pressure (pp. 191–214). Brill.

Won, S., & Chang, Y. (2024). Antecedents and consequences of academic help-seeking in online STEM learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1438299.

Woolf, K., McManus, I. C., Gill, D., & Dacre, J. (2009). The effect of a brief social intervention on the examination results of UK medical students: A cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 9, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-35

Wright, C. D., Eddy, S. L., Wenderoth, M. P., Abshire, E., Blankenbiller, M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Cognitive difficulty and format of exams predicts gender and socioeconomic gaps in exam performance of students in introductory biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(2), Article 23. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0246

Wright, M. C. (2023). Centers for teaching and learning: The new landscape in higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Wright-Kim, J. (2022). The impact of offering baccalaureate degrees on institutional enrollment in community colleges. Community College Review, 51(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521221125500

Wu, J., Cropps, T., Phillips, C. M. L., Boyle, S., & Pearson, Y. E. (2023). Applicant qualifications and characteristics in STEM faculty hiring: An analysis of faculty and administrator perspectives. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00431-w

Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 331–357. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659

Xu, C., & Lastrapes, R. E. (2022). Impact of STEM sense of belonging on career interest: The role of STEM attitudes. Journal of Career Development, 49(6), 1215–1229.

Yao, C., Follmer Greenhoot, A., Mack, K., Myrick, C., Poolaw, J., Powell, L., & Yarger, L. (2023, October). Humanizing STEM education: An ecological systems framework for educating the whole student. Frontiers in Education, 8, p. 1175871.

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yee, M. (2019). Why ‘safe spaces’ are important for mental health—especially on college campuses. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/safe-spaces-college#1

Yee, S. P., Deshler, J., Rogers, K. C., Petrulis, R., Potvin, C. D., & Sweeney, J. (2021). Bridging the gap between observation protocols and formative feedback. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09485-x

Yee, S. P., Hauk, S., Lopez Gonzalez, T., & Wang, J. (2023a). College mathematics instructor professional development providers: Who are they? School Science and Mathematics, 123(2), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12571

Yee, S. P., Papalia, N., Deshler, J., Rogers, K. C., Lamarche, A., & Petrulis, R. (2023b). Graduate student instructor peer-mentoring: Design and impact. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies (PRIMUS), 34(7), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2023.2241459

Yee, S. P., Rogers, K. C., Miller, E., & Galvin, T. (2022). Collegiate mathematics observation protocols: Current characteristics and desired foci. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 10, 318–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00199-4

Yee, S. P., Wang, J., Hauk, S., & Lopez Gonzalez, T. (2023c). Providers of professional development for novice college mathematics instructors: Perspectives and values about teaching and learning. In S. Cook, B. Katz, and D. Moore-Russo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 420–428). Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Johnson, E. (2022). Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00333-3

Yother, T. L., Dubikovsky, S., Ropp, T., Thom, J. M., Wang, P. H., Hagovsky, T. C., Davis, J. M., & Barnes, D. (2022). Identification of core competencies for bachelor of science degrees in aeronautical engineering technology. Journal of Engineering Technology, 39(1), 42–55.

Yuen, V. (2020). The $78 billion community college funding shortfall. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/10/Community-College-Shortfall6.pdf

Zhang, C., Kuncel, N. R., & Sackett, P. R. (2020). The process of attrition in pre-medical studies: A large-scale analysis across 102 schools. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243546.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

Zhang, Y. L. (2022). Early academic momentum: Factors contributing to community college transfer students’ STEM degree attainment. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(4), 873–902.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

Zimmerman, J. (2020). The amateur hour: A history of college teaching in America. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Zinth, J. D. (2014). Increasing student access and success in dual enrollment programs: 13 model state-level policy components. Education Commission of the States.

___. (2019, August). 50-state comparison: Dual/concurrent enrollment policies 2019. https://reports.ecs.org/comparisons/dual-concurrent-enrollment-2019

Ziori, E., & Dienes, Z. (2008). How does prior knowledge affect implicit and explicit concept learning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 601–624.

Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00687.x

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 265
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 266
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 267
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 268
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 269
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 270
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 271
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 272
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 273
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 274
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 275
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 276
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 277
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 278
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 279
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 280
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 281
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 282
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 283
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 284
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 285
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 286
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 287
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 288
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 289
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 290
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 291
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 292
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 293
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 294
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 295
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 296
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 297
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 298
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 299
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 300
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 301
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 302
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 303
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 304
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 305
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 306
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 307
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 308
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 309
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 310
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 311
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 312
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 313
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 314
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 315
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 316
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 317
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 318
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 319
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 320
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 321
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 322
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 323
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 324
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 325
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 326
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 327
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 328
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 329
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 330
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 331
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 332
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 333
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 334
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 335
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 336
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 337
Suggested Citation: "References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education: Supporting Equitable and Effective Teaching. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/28268.
Page 338
Next Chapter: Appendix A: Public Comments on Draft Report and Committee Response
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.